Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT7 S1 Q16 Explanation

Comets do not give off

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Comets do not give off their own light but reflect light from other sources, such as the Sun. Scientists estimate the mass of comets by their brightness: the greater a comet’s mass, the more light that comet will reflect. A satellite probe, however, has revealed that the material of light per unit of mass than had been previously thought.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Setup

Scientists estimate how massive a comet is by how bright it looks. The brighter the reflection, the more mass — that's the assumption. New finding: the stuff Halley's comet is made of reflects 60 times less light per unit of mass than scientists assumed.

Evaluate

Picture two flashlights pointed at a wall. A bright wall means a strong flashlight, right? But what if the wall is way less reflective than you thought — the bright wall now actually means an even stronger flashlight than you originally guessed.

Same idea here. For Halley's observed brightness, the comet must contain way more mass than the old method gave it credit for. The old estimates were too low.

Goal

Find the answer that follows: previous mass estimates of Halley's comet were too low.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

The statements above, if true, give the most support to which one

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported4% picked this

    Some comets are composed of material that reflects 60 times more light per unit of mass than the material of

    The stimulus only tells us about Halley's reflectivity vs. what was previously thought. It doesn't establish anything about what other comets' material reflects, or compare Halley's to other comets. There's no support for "some comets reflect 60 times more per unit of mass."

  2. Correct44% picked this

    Previous estimates of the mass of Halley’s comet which were based on its brightness

    Why this is right

    This is what follows. Previous estimates were based on brightness, using a reflectivity assumption that turns out to have been 60x too high. So for the brightness observed, the previously inferred mass was too low — Halley's actual mass (per the new reflectivity figure) is much larger than the old estimate said.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Unsupported36% picked this

    The total amount of light reflected from Halley’s comet is less than scientists

    The stimulus says scientists were wrong about the comet's reflectivity per unit of mass — not about the total amount of light reflected from the comet. The total light reflected hasn't changed; what's changed is the inferred relationship between that light and the comet's mass.

  4. Unsupported9% picked this

    The reflective properties of the material of which comets are composed vary considerably from

    The stimulus tells us about Halley's composition specifically, not about variation across comets. We have no information about how reflective different comets' materials are relative to each other.

  5. Unsupported6% picked this

    Scientists need more information before they can make a good estimate of the mass

    This is a recommendation about future research, not something the stimulus supports. With the new reflectivity figure, scientists can revise their estimate using the same brightness data — they don't obviously need more information to make a better estimate. The stimulus gives no basis for saying the existing data is insufficient.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free