Reading Comprehension

PT6 · S1 · P1 · Q2 Taft-Hartley Act

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The Taft-Hartley Act, passed by the United States Congress in 1947, gave states the power to enact “right-to-work” legislation that prohibits union shop agreements.

Topic

The impact of right-to-work laws on unions, wages, and especially on Black workers in the United States.

Framework

Challenge Position (with elements of Present Debate)

Main Point

Right-to-work laws—contrary to some research claiming they have little effect—actually weaken union power and adversely affect workers’ wages, disproportionately harming Black workers’ economic positions unless offset by strong economic growth. () Also: (2nd paragraph)

P1: Debating the Real Impact of Right-to-Work Laws

This paragraph sets up a debate about whether right-to-work laws actually affect union membership and economic outcomes. While much writing says these laws don’t do much, Carroll argues they do—just not always by reducing union membership outright. Instead, these laws slow the spread of unions, weaken union power, and lead to lower wages because manufacturers can collude more easily when unions are less strong.

P2: Consequences for Black and Minority Workers

This paragraph explores what happens, especially to Black and minority workers, when union power is reduced by right-to-work laws. Research shows unions—particularly industrial unions—help improve Black workers’ wage equity with White workers. Therefore, weakening unions harms Black workers more, unless there are special circumstances (like a labor shortage) that push wages up independently of union strength.

2.

According to the passage, which one of the following is true of Carroll’s study?

  1. It implies that right-to-work laws

    Contradicted: negligible effect

    "Carroll argues that the right-to-work laws 'do matter' in that such laws generate differences in real wages across states".

    4% picked this

  2. It demonstrates that right-to-work laws

    Too Strong: significantly decreased

    Some people think that right-to-work laws have had little impact, because they assume "If these laws are not significantly reducing union membership within a state, then they have no effect". Carroll is arguing, "even if they don't significantly reduce membership, they still do have an effect (of generating differences in real wages from state to state)." This answer accuses him of saying, "they do significantly reduce membership", which he never said or supported.

    4% picked this

  3. Correct

    It argues that right-to-work laws

    Why this is right

    Carroll is arguing, "even if these laws don't significantly reduce membership, they still do have an effect (of generating differences in real wages from state to state)." Carroll further says, "right-to-work laws impede the spread of unions and thereby reduce wages within right-to-work states". This is supporting #1 and #3 of our basket of bullet points: - right-to-work laws generate differences in real wages across stages - these laws don't seem to significantly reduce union membership - but these laws impede the spread of unions, which reduces wages - in states that have these laws, manufacturers and suppliers can act collusively to keep wages low

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    87% picked this

  4. It supports the findings of

    Opposite: supports earlier

    Carroll is brought up to go against the grain of the previous researchers. He criticizes their myopic focus and challenges their overall conclusion.

    1% picked this

  5. It explains the mechanisms by

    Too Specific: explains mechanisms

    The last of our four bullet points talked about collusion, but the author doesn't provide any detail about the mechanisms by which collusion is accomplished. The author simply says that as a result of right-to-work laws weakening unions, collusion can happen.

    4% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free