Reading Comprehension

PT6 · S1 · P1 · Q1 Taft-Hartley Act

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The Taft-Hartley Act, passed by the United States Congress in 1947, gave states the power to enact “right-to-work” legislation that prohibits union shop agreements.

Topic

The impact of right-to-work laws on unions, wages, and especially on Black workers in the United States.

Framework

Challenge Position (with elements of Present Debate)

Main Point

Right-to-work laws—contrary to some research claiming they have little effect—actually weaken union power and adversely affect workers’ wages, disproportionately harming Black workers’ economic positions unless offset by strong economic growth. () Also: (2nd paragraph)

P1: Debating the Real Impact of Right-to-Work Laws

This paragraph sets up a debate about whether right-to-work laws actually affect union membership and economic outcomes. While much writing says these laws don’t do much, Carroll argues they do—just not always by reducing union membership outright. Instead, these laws slow the spread of unions, weaken union power, and lead to lower wages because manufacturers can collude more easily when unions are less strong.

P2: Consequences for Black and Minority Workers

This paragraph explores what happens, especially to Black and minority workers, when union power is reduced by right-to-work laws. Research shows unions—particularly industrial unions—help improve Black workers’ wage equity with White workers. Therefore, weakening unions harms Black workers more, unless there are special circumstances (like a labor shortage) that push wages up independently of union strength.

1.

The reasoning behind the “literature” (first paragraph), as that reasoning is presented in the passage, is most analogous to the reasoning behind which one of the following situations?

  1. A law is proposed that

    Trap

    10% picked this

  2. A new tax on certain

    Trap

    1% picked this

  3. A college sets strict course

    Trap

    2% picked this

  4. The personnel office of a

    Trap

    3% picked this

  5. Correct

    A fare increase in a

    Why this is right

    Answer E is correct.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    83% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free