Reading Comprehension

PT5 · S4 · P3 · Q17 Bacteria

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Although bacteria are unicellular and among the simplest autonomous forms of life, they show a remarkable ability to sense their environment.

Topic

How bacteria use their movement patterns and sensing abilities to find chemical attractants.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

Bacteria navigate toward attractants not by directly steering but by adjusting the frequency of their tumbling based on changes in the concentration they detect over time, implying that they compare concentrations at different times rather than just at different points on their bodies. ( — last sentence)

P1: The Puzzle of Bacterial Movement

Despite being so simple, bacteria can find things they need and avoid things that are bad for them. However, it’s confusing to scientists because their usual way of moving—a mix of straight-line runs and random tumbles—seems, at first glance, too erratic to allow for purposeful navigation.

P2: How Movement Changes with Attractants

When scientists add an attractant (like food) to the environment, bacteria tend to do longer, straighter runs toward the stronger concentration of the attractant and tumble less frequently; as they head away from the attractant, they tumble more and do shorter runs. So, they effectively "bias" their randomness toward the good stuff.

P3: The Sensing Mechanism—How Do They Know?

Biologists have two main hypotheses for how bacteria sense chemical gradients: (1) comparing concentrations at the front and back of the cell at the same time, or (2) comparing concentrations over time (having a small memory of the past). Experiments suggest the second explanation is correct, since bacteria respond to a sudden high concentration by acting as if they’re moving up a gradient—something only possible if they’re comparing concentrations over time, not space.

17.

It can be inferred from the passage that a bacterium would increase the likelihood of its moving away from an area where the concentration of a harmful substance is high if it did which one of the following?

  1. increased the speed at which

    Unrelated to Goal

    There's nothing in here that sounds like the bacterium has picked up on the scent of a harmful substance by measuring different concentrations of it at two different times. The passage never talks about "increased swimming speed".

    7% picked this

  2. detected a concentration gradient of

    Unclear Relationship

    Does swimming towards an attractant signify that it's swimming away from a harmful substance? Not clearly. It's possible that attractants and harmful substances are both in the same location.

    15% picked this

  3. relied on the simultaneous measurement

    Unrelated to Goal

    This is saying that if it switched to the front/back method then it would likely be swimming away from a harmful substance. That doesn't make any sense. Neither method is inherently better or worse for going towards attractants or away from repellants. So switching from one method to another wouldn't tell us anything about whether the bacterium was headed toward/away from a repellant or attractant.

    5% picked this

  4. exhibited a complete cessation of

    Opposite

    When a bacterium detects increases in the concentration of an attractant it ceases tumbling. When it turns off tumbling, it starts heading toward something. So if increased concentrations of harmful substances led to a cessation of tumbling, then the bacterium would be heading toward the harmful substance.

    7% picked this

  5. Correct

    exhibited an increased tendency to

    Why this is right

    Tumbling is turned off when the bacterium picks up on the scent of something good. So if we Flip the Fact, we can infer that tumbling is turned on when the bacterium picks up on the scent of something bad. "Picking up on the scent" = detecting higher concentrations of it. So this is saying that if a bacterium increased tumbling (i.e. its escape mechanism) when it detected higher concentrations of a harmful substance, and decreased tumbling (i.e. its "let's go in that direction" move) when it detected lower concentrations, then it would be likely to move away from the harmful substance.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    66% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free