Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT5 S4 P3 Q17 Explanation

Bacteria

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Although bacteria are unicellular and among the simplest autonomous forms of life, they show a remarkable ability to sense their environment. They are attracted to materials they need and are repelled by harmful substances. Most types of bacteria swim very erratically; short smooth runs in relatively straight lines are followed by brief pattern consists only of smooth runs and tumbles, the latter resulting in random changes in direction.

One clue comes from the observation that when a chemical attractant is added to a suspension of such bacteria, the bacteria swim along a gradient of the attractant, from an area where the concentration of the attractant is weaker to an area where it is stronger. As they do so, their swimming from it are shortened by an increased tendency of the bacteria to tumble and change direction.

Biologists have proposed two mechanisms that bacteria might use in detecting changes in the concentration of a chemical attractant. First, a bacterium might compare the concentration of a chemical at the front and back of its cell body simultaneously. If the concentration is higher at the front of the cell, then it cells, though high, would be uniform. Experimental evidence suggests that bacteria compare concentrations at different times.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

It can be inferred from the passage that a bacterium would increase the likelihood of its moving away from an area where the concentration of a harmful substance

Answer choices

  1. Unrelated to Goal8% picked this

    increased the speed at which it swam immediately after undergoing the random changes in direction

    There's nothing in here that sounds like the bacterium has picked up on the scent of a harmful substance by measuring different concentrations of it at two different times. The passage never talks about "increased swimming speed".

  2. Unclear Relationship14% picked this

    detected a concentration gradient of an attractant toward which it could

    Does swimming towards an attractant signify that it's swimming away from a harmful substance? Not clearly. It's possible that attractants and harmful substances are both in the same location.

  3. Unrelated to Goal5% picked this

    relied on the simultaneous measurement of the concentration of the substance in front and back of its body, rather than on the comparison of

    This is saying that if it switched to the front/back method then it would likely be swimming away from a harmful substance. That doesn't make any sense. Neither method is inherently better or worse for going towards attractants or away from repellants. So switching from one method to another wouldn't tell us anything about whether the bacterium was headed toward/away from a repellant or attractant.

  4. Opposite6% picked this

    exhibited a complete cessation of tumbling when it detected increases in the concentration

    When a bacterium detects increases in the concentration of an attractant it ceases tumbling. When it turns off tumbling, it starts heading toward something. So if increased concentrations of harmful substances led to a cessation of tumbling, then the bacterium would be heading toward the harmful substance.

  5. Correct66% picked this

    exhibited an increased tendency to tumble as it encountered increasing concentrations of the substance, and suppressed tumbling as it detected decreases in

    Why this is right

    Tumbling is turned off when the bacterium picks up on the scent of something good. So if we Flip the Fact, we can infer that tumbling is turned on when the bacterium picks up on the scent of something bad. "Picking up on the scent" = detecting higher concentrations of it. So this is saying that if a bacterium increased tumbling (i.e. its escape mechanism) when it detected higher concentrations of a harmful substance, and decreased tumbling (i.e. its "let's go in that direction" move) when it detected lower concentrations, then it would be likely to move away from the harmful substance.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free