Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT5 S4 P3 Q16 Explanation

Bacteria

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Although bacteria are unicellular and among the simplest autonomous forms of life, they show a remarkable ability to sense their environment. They are attracted to materials they need and are repelled by harmful substances. Most types of bacteria swim very erratically; short smooth runs in relatively straight lines are followed by brief pattern consists only of smooth runs and tumbles, the latter resulting in random changes in direction.

One clue comes from the observation that when a chemical attractant is added to a suspension of such bacteria, the bacteria swim along a gradient of the attractant, from an area where the concentration of the attractant is weaker to an area where it is stronger. As they do so, their swimming from it are shortened by an increased tendency of the bacteria to tumble and change direction.

Biologists have proposed two mechanisms that bacteria might use in detecting changes in the concentration of a chemical attractant. First, a bacterium might compare the concentration of a chemical at the front and back of its cell body simultaneously. If the concentration is higher at the front of the cell, then it cells, though high, would be uniform. Experimental evidence suggests that bacteria compare concentrations at different times.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

It can be inferred from the passage that which one of the following experimental results would suggest that bacteria detect changes in the concentration of an attractant by

Answer choices

  1. Opposite6% picked this

    When suddenly transferred from a medium in which the concentration of an attractant was uniformly low to one in which the concentration was uniformly

    If the bacterium uses the front/back method, then any uniform concentration of an attractant will cause the same behavior. There's no difference whether that uniform concentration is high or low. As long as the concentration is uniform, the front measurement = the back measurement, so the bacterium will still be doing its normal routine of runs and tumbles. This answer says that when it moves from one uniform concentration to another one, its tumbling behavior changes.

  2. Correct60% picked this

    When suddenly transferred from a medium in which the concentration of an attractant was uniformly low to one in which the concentration was uniformly

    Why this is right

    As discussed with (A), all uniform concentrations are the same to the front/back method. Whether the concentration of X is high or low, if its uniform, then front = back and so no change in run/tumble behavior is triggered.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Opposite19% picked this

    When suddenly transferred from a medium in which the concentration of an attractant was uniformly low to one in which the concentration was uniformly

    When the concentration of an attractant is uniform, then the front/back method can't "pick up on the scent", so it never departs from its default searching routine of runs and tumbles. This answer is saying that the bacterium would stop tumbling. This answer would support the Different-Times method.

  4. Opposite7% picked this

    When placed in a medium in which the concentration of an attractant was in some areas low and in others high, the bacteria exhibited

    The front/back method is trying to figure out which direction has the higher direction of concentration, so that it can move in that direction. In order to move in that direction, it just keeps doing runs and stops doing tumbles. This answer is saying that tumbling is turned up extra high as the bacterium moves towards higher concentrations.

  5. Opposite8% picked this

    When suddenly transferred from a medium in which the concentration of an attractant was uniformly low to one that was completely free of attractants,

    Like (A) and (C), when the concentration of an attractant is uniform, then the front/back method can't "pick up on the scent", so it never departs from its default searching routine of runs and tumbles. A medium with a uniformly low concentration would be the same to a front/back bacterium as a medium with uniformly no concentration. So it would behave the same in both. In neither case would front/back be able to pick up on the scent of an attractant.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free