Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT5 S3 Q5 Explanation

Animals with a certain behavioral disorder

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Animals with a certain behavioral disorder have unusually high levels of aluminum in their brain tissue. Since a silicon-based compound binds to aluminum and prevents it from affecting the brain tissue, animals by being treated with the compound.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

The argument is based on which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Not Necessary: Invariable levels3% picked this

    Animals with the disorder have unusually high but invariable levels of aluminum in

    This answer is unnecessary because variability in aluminum levels doesn’t undermine the connection between aluminum and the disorder proposed in the argument. The author can still argue that aluminum is problematic even if its levels vary among different animals.

  2. Correct81% picked this

    Aluminum is the cause of the disorder rather than merely an

    Why this is right

    Aluminum is the cause of the disorder rather than merely an effect of it. For the author's argument that treating animals with a silicon-based compound will cure them to hold water, it's vital to the logic of the argument that aluminum is actually causing the disorder. This answer choice confirms that causal link. If aluminum were merely a byproduct of the disorder, neutralizing it might have no effect on the disorder itself. Thus, this assumption is crucial.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Specific: Side effects11% picked this

    Introducing the compound into the brain tissue has no

    While it's tempting to think a lack of side effects is necessary, the argument is focused on the theoretical cure through binding aluminum. Side effects neither prove nor disprove the compound’s efficacy in binding aluminum to prevent its negative impact.

  4. Out of Scope: Species-specific neutralization1% picked this

    The amount of the compound needed to neutralize the aluminum in an animal’s brain tissue varies

    The argument doesn't get into specifics about varying compound amounts across species. The underlying logic only requires us to believe that the compound, in general, is effective, which makes this level of detail irrelevant.

  5. Out of Scope Comparison3% picked this

    Aluminum is never present in normal

    The argument does not require us to establish conditions for what’s normal or not in brain tissue beyond the fact that aluminum is at high levels in affected animals. It suffices to know there’s more aluminum than there typically should be in the animals with the disorder.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free