Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT3 S3 P4 Q26 Explanation

Navajo Weaving

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. He argues that three of them can be identified by the type of design used to form horizontal bands: colored stripes, zigzags, or diamonds. The fourth, or distinct border surrounding centrally placed, dominating figures.

Amsden believes that the diamond style appeared after 1869 when, under Anglo influence and encouragement, the blanket became a rug with larger designs and bolder lines. The bordered style appeared about 1890, and, Amsden argues, it reflects the greatest number of Anglo influences on the newly emerging rug business. The Anglo desire that in early bordered specimens strips of color unexpectedly break through the enclosing pattern.

Amsden argues that the bordered rug represents a radical break with previous styles. He asserts that the border changed the artistic problem facing weavers: a blank area suggests the use of isolated figures, while traditional, banded Navajo designs were continuous and did alternated horizontal decorative zones in a regular order.

Amsden’s view raises several questions. First, what is involved in altering artistic styles? Some studies suggest that artisans’ motor habits and thought processes must be revised when a style changes precipitously. In the evolution of Navajo weaving, however, no radical revisions in the way articles are produced need be assumed. After all, required to make decorative borders are, therefore, latent and easily brought to the surface.

Second, is the relationship between the banded and bordered styles as simple as Amsden suggests? He assumes that a break in style is a break in psychology. But if style results from constant quests for invention, such stylistic breaks are inevitable. When a style has exhausted the possibilities inherent in its principles, Navajo weaving may have reached this turning point prior to 1890.

Third, is there really a significant stylistic gap? Two other styles lie between the banded styles and the bordered style. They suggest that disintegration of the bands may have altered visual and motor habits and prepared the way for a border filled with separate units. In the Chief White Antelope blanket, dated Parts of diamonds arranged vertically at each side may be seen to anticipate the border.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

The author suggests that Amsden’s claim that borders in Navajo weaving were inspired by Anglo

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: Anglo art11% picked this

    conceived as a response to imagined correspondences between Anglo and

    There isn't any discussion in the passage of Anglo art, or of any correspondences between what Anglo and Navajo art had in common.

  2. Out of Scope: Amsden's feelings3% picked this

    biased by Amsden’s feelings about Anglo

    We never hear anything about what Amsden feels about Anglo culture. All we hear is that Amsden's claim that there was Anglo desire for anything with a graphic design to have a top, a bottom, and a border.

  3. Correct75% picked this

    a result of Amsden’s failing to take into account certain aspects

    Why this is right

    This is a vague answer, but it can effectively be a stand-in for the wide ranging discussions in the final three paragraphs. What are the certain aspects that the author thinks Amsden fails to take into account? - since weaving already involves an implicit border constraint (the edge of the fabric), transitioning into decorative borders didn't require any radical revision in terms of Navajo motor habits or thought processes. - just because the bordered style is a break with previous styles, that doesn't mean that there's a new (read: Anglo) psychology entering the mix. The Navajo artists may have had the consistent psychology of constant quests for invention. The border can be see as just one more step in their artistic evolution. - the bordered style really isn't that much of a break from previous styles. There were a couple stepping stone styles in between the banded and the bordered style, making it easier to see how the bordered style was in a continuum of artistic choices being made by the Navajo, not dictated by Anglos.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope: limited specimens7% picked this

    based on a limited number of specimens of the styles of

    Nowhere in those final three paragraphs is the author saying that Amsden might have a skewed impression as a result of having too few specimens to really understand the full picture. The final paragraph brings up a specimen (the CWA blanket) that undermines Amsden's argument. But the author doesn't make it seem like Amsden didn't have access to this specimen.

  5. No Match4% picked this

    based on a confusion between the stylistic features of the zigzag

    Nothing in the final three paragraphs is dealing with the earliest styles and saying that Amsden screwed up his analysis of style 2 vs. style 3. The final three paragraphs are questioning Amsden's analysis of whether style 4 (bordered) was really a drastic break from styles 1/2/3 and caused primarily by Anglo influence.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free