Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT23 S4 P2 Q7 Explanation

Medieval Women's Power

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Medievalists usually distinguished medieval public law from private law: the former was concerned with government and military affairs and the latter with the family, social status, and land transactions. Examination of medieval women’s lives shows this distinction to be overly simplistic. Although medieval women were legally excluded from roles thus categorized as disposing of certain property, suing in court, incurring liability for their own debts, and making wills.

Although feudal lands were normally transferred through primogeniture (the eldest son inheriting all), when no sons survived, the surviving daughters inherited equal shares under what was known as partible inheritance. In addition to controlling any such land inherited from her parents and any bridal dowry—property a woman brought to the marriage from lands jointly with the bride, so that if one spouse died, the other received these lands.

Since many widows had inheritances as well as dowers, widows were frequently the financial heads of the family; even though legal theory assumed the maintenance of the principle of primogeniture, the amount of land the widow controlled could exceed that of her son or of other male heirs. Anyone who held feudal sway is indicated by the fact that some controlled not merely single estates, but multiple counties.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

With which one of the following statements about the views held by the medievalists mentioned in line 1 would the author of the

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Emphasis: landowner2% picked this

    The medieval role of landowner was less affected by thirteenth-century changes in law than these

    The rebuttal to the medievalists is specifically about female landowners, not landowners in general. Female landowners are an example of "private law, relating to landowning, having a public influence", which the author uses to undermine the medievalists view that public law and private law were separate.

  2. Unsupported Comparison: implications6% picked this

    The realm of law labeled public by these medievalists ultimately had greater political implications than

    This answer is just taking to buzzwords from the sentence where medievalists is found, "Public law and private law", and fabricating an out of scope comparison. We never compared which realm had greater implications. The author is merely saying to the medievalists, "in the case of these landowning women, their private law encounters had political implications".

  3. Out of Support Window: wealth9% picked this

    The amount of wealth controlled by medieval women was greater than these

    The medievalists have only committed to one position in this passage, and it's contained in the 1st sentence. And nothing in that sentence is talking about how much wealth controlled by medieval women has been recorded. The author isn't complaining that the medievalists have failed to properly tally up their wealth. He's complaining that they have failed to recognize how female landowners would have been a tricky case of public/political legal power taking place within the "private" court system.

  4. Wrong Objection: actual cases14% picked this

    The distinction made by these medievalists between private law and public law fails to consider some of the actual

    The beginning of this answer sounds great, but it should say "fails to consider how female landowners of the time seemed to take private law into the public realm."

  5. Correct69% picked this

    The distinction made by these medievalists between private and public law fails to address the political importance of control over

    Why this is right

    We wanted this to say that the distinction "fails to consider how female landowners of the time seemed to take private law into the public realm." This is saying "failed to consider the political importance of control over land". It's an awkward fit, but it's code-language for what we want to be talking about. If medievalists had thought more about the political importance of control over land, they might have better recognized that when it came to female landowners, they would be excluded from public court but still wielding political power through private courts.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free