Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT23 S2 Q16 Explanation

Some health officials are concerned

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Some health officials are concerned about the current sustained increase in reported deaths from alcohol-related conditions, attributing this increase to a rise in alcoholism. What these health officials are overlooking, however, is that attitudes toward alcoholism have changed radically. Alcoholism is now widely viewed as a disease, whereas in the past it alcohol-related because physicians are more likely to identify these deaths as alcohol-related.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for

Answer choices

  1. Weakens2% picked this

    The frequent use of alcohol by young people is being reported as occurring at

    This answer makes it sound like consumption of alcohol is actually changing, which would be the Alternate Explanation the author is rejecting. The author is selling us on a story where consumption of alcohol is basically the same. What's changed, instead, is attitudes about alcohol leading more people to "admit" that a death was alcohol related.

  2. No Impact5% picked this

    In some places and times, susceptibility to any kind of disease has been viewed as

    This is incredibly weak (some), so it's unlikely to ever be a correct answer on Strengthen, Weaken, Paradox, or Sufficient Assumption. It just saying "there was at least one place in the history of mankind where susceptibility to any kind of disease was viewed as a moral failing". That tells us nothing about the situation happening here and now with alcohol-related deaths.

  3. Correct89% picked this

    More physicians now than in the past are trained to recognize the physical

    Why this is right

    This adds some plausibility to the author's explanation. She is saying that the real reason for the uptick in reported alcohol-deaths is that things have changed in terms of how we view alcoholism. The same number of deaths always occurred, but we used to not label them as alcohol-related. She is claiming that nowadays physicians are more likely to identify these deaths as alcohol-related. One premise to support that is that we now see alcoholism more as a disease. Another premise to support that is this answer choice -- more doctors nowadays are trained to recognize the physical effects of alcoholism. Back in the day, when it wasn't considered a disease, physicians weren't trained to recognize its physical effects, so if they were looking at a patient who died from alcohol-related conditions, the physician might not realize that it was an alcohol-related condition (and the family members wouldn't volunteer that information, since alcoholism was considered a moral failing).

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. No Impact2% picked this

    Even though alcoholism is considered to be a disease, most doctors recommend psychological counseling and support groups

    The way that most doctors choose to treat alcoholism is irrelevant to this discussion. We are trying to figure out why there's been an uptick in reported deaths from alcoholism. Is it because doctors are more likely to label certain deaths as alcohol-related? This answer does nothing to help us judge that question.

  5. No Impact2% picked this

    Many health officials are not

    This is so weak that it would almost never be a correct answer on Strengthen, Weaken, Paradox, or Sufficient Assumption. It's telling us, "there are at least 5 health officials who aren't physicians". Cool, (E). We know. We were never thinking that virtually all health officials are physicians.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free