Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT2 S4 Q25 Explanation

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act, the United States automobile industry argued that meeting the act’s standards for automobile emissions was neither economically feasible nor environmentally necessary. However, the catalytic converter, invented in 1967, enabled automakers to meet the 1970 standards efficiently. Currently, automakers are lobbying against the government’s attempt to efforts to curb air pollution. Clearly, the automobile industry’s position should not be heeded.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

Which one of the following, if true, lends the most support to the

Answer choices

  1. Correct75% picked this

    The more stringent the legislation restricting emissions becomes, the more difficult it becomes for automakers to provide

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap8% picked this

    Emissions-restriction technology can often be engineered so as to avoid reducing the efficiency with which

  3. Trap5% picked this

    Not every new piece of legislation restricting emissions requires new automotive technology in order for automakers

  4. Trap4% picked this

    The more automobiles there are on the road, the more stringent emission restrictions must be to prevent

  5. Trap7% picked this

    Unless forced to do so by the government, automakers rarely make changes in automotive technology that is

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free