Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT2 S4 Q24 Explanation

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMethod

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act, the United States automobile industry argued that meeting the act’s standards for automobile emissions was neither economically feasible nor environmentally necessary. However, the catalytic converter, invented in 1967, enabled automakers to meet the 1970 standards efficiently. Currently, automakers are lobbying against the government’s attempt to efforts to curb air pollution. Clearly, the automobile industry’s position should not be heeded.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the method used to counter the

Answer choices

  1. Trap9% picked this

    The automakers’ premises are shown to lead to

  2. Trap8% picked this

    Facts are mentioned that show that the automakers are relying on

  3. Trap6% picked this

    A flaw is pointed out in the reasoning used by the automakers to

  4. Correct68% picked this

    A comparison is drawn between the automakers’ current position and a position they held

    Why this is right

    Answer D is correct.

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Trap9% picked this

    Evidence is provided that the new emissions legislation is both economically feasible

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free