The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation, not to give large corporations program is merely the implementation of a methodology.
What this question is testing
Your task
Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.
Common trap
Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).
Winning move
Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.