Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT17 S3 Q2 Explanation

A certain type of insect trap uses

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A certain type of insect trap uses a scented lure to attract rose beetles into a plastic bag from which it is difficult for them to escape. If several of these traps are installed in a backyard garden, the number of rose beetles in the garden will be greatly number of rose beetles in the garden will actually increase.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Fact 1

Lots of traps in a garden? Beetle population drops a lot.

Fact 2

Just one trap? Beetle population goes up.

Evaluate

The clue is in how the trap works: a scented lure attracts beetles into a bag. So the trap has two effects — it pulls beetles in (the lure), and it removes them (the bag).

Think of a magnet picking up paper clips. The magnet attracts every clip in range, but it can only hold so many before the rest fall off. With one magnet, it might attract many clips but only hold a few — so loose clips collect on the table around it. With several magnets, each one still attracts clips, but now there are enough magnets to hold all of them.

Same logic for the traps. One trap's lure attracts more beetles than the trap can capture, so extra beetles roam the garden. Several traps still attract beetles, but with enough capacity to capture them.

Goal

Find the answer that explains this attraction-versus-capture mismatch and how it flips when there are more traps.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the

Answer choices

  1. No Distinction3% picked this

    The scent of a single trap’s lure usually cannot be detected throughout a backyard garden

    If a single lure cannot reach all beetles in the garden, that suggests one trap should attract fewer beetles than several traps would — but it does not explain why a single trap increases the population. If the lure does not reach distant beetles, those beetles should be unaffected, not multiplied. This does not resolve the paradox.

  2. Restates Paradox10% picked this

    Several traps are better able to catch a large number of rose beetles than is one trap alone, since any rose beetles that evade

    This just confirms that several traps catch more beetles than one trap does — which is part of what we already knew, since several traps reduce the population while one increases it. It does not explain why one trap actively makes things worse. Catching fewer is not the same as causing an increase.

  3. Cheats Paradox1% picked this

    When there are several traps in a garden, they each capture fewer rose beetles than any single trap would if it were

    If anything, this deepens the puzzle. If each of several traps catches fewer beetles than a lone trap would, then a single trap must be efficient at capture. So why does that efficient single trap leave the garden with more beetles? This answer makes the one-trap problem harder to explain, not easier.

  4. Correct69% picked this

    The presence of any traps in a backyard garden will attract more rose beetles than one trap can catch, but several traps will not

    Why this is right

    This is the explanation. The lure attracts more beetles than one trap can capture — meaning one trap pulls in beetles from outside the garden but cannot catch them all, leaving the surplus loose in the garden. Several traps will not attract significantly more beetles than one trap (the lure's drawing power is roughly fixed), but they provide enough capture capacity to actually catch the beetles that get drawn in. So adding traps does not multiply the attraction; it multiplies the capture. Result: with one trap, attraction outpaces capture and the population rises; with several, capture catches up and the population falls.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. No Distinction16% picked this

    When there is only one trap in the garden, the plastic bag quickly becomes filled to capacity, allowing

    Even if one trap's bag fills up and lets some beetles escape, those escapees were beetles that had already been in the garden (they were attracted by the lure but not held by the bag). This explains why a single trap might be less effective than expected, but it does not explain why the population rises beyond what it would have been with no trap. The increase needs an outside source of beetles — namely, beetles attracted in by the lure from outside the garden.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free