Ditrama is a federation made up of three autonomous regions: Korva, Mitro, and Guadar.
Reading Goal: Get the Facts
Each region gets a share of $ equal to the share of the total population that lives in that region.
Korva got less $ even though their population increased.
Anticipate
LSAT Questions that deal with precents frequently hinge on the relationship between fluctuations in percentages and fluctuations in the raw numbers that the percentages are based on. This question tells us that the raw number of people in Korva went up. But because they got less money this year, and the money is based on percent, we can also infer that the percentage of the total population of Ditrama living in Korva went down.
This inference might show up in the answers just like that, or it might manifest in further inferences about the other regions. In order for the percentage of the population living in Korva to have gone down, the percentage of the population living outside of Korva must have gone up. In order for that to happen, the raw number of people living in the other regions, taken together, must have gone up even more than the number of people living in Korva went up.
If all that seems pretty confusing, there's a global LSAT takeaway here worth committing to memory: When an increase in number doesn't lead to a similar increase in percent, it's because the numbers in the other things increased even more, making the whole bigger and the percentage of the thing in question smaller.