Consumer advocate: The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose.
Conclusion (should = opinion)
The toy-labeling law should require manufacturers to provide explicit safety labels on toys to indicate what hazards the toys pose.
Evidence
The only labels currently required by law are labels indicating the age range for which a toy is intended, like a "three and up" label for toys that pose a choking hazard for children under three years of age.
Although the current toy-labeling law has reduced the incidence of injuries to children, parents could prevent such injuries almost entirely if toy labels provided explicit safety information.
Evaluate
This argument presents a recommendation about amending the existing toy-labeling law.
The Recommendation-World involves adding explicit safety labels, compared to the Current-World, which uses only age-range labels.
The author assumes that providing explicit safety labels would significantly improve parents' ability to prevent injuries, suggesting that the current age-range labels are insufficient in conveying necessary safety information.
To strengthen the argument, we would want evidence that supports the notion that parents misunderstand the current labels or cannot effectively prevent injuries with the existing labels.
Goal
Let's find an answer that shows the current labeling system is inadequate and explicit safety labels would significantly improve parental safety interventions.