Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT146 S4 P3 Q21 Explanation

Clay Tokens

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Hundreds of clay tablets marked in cuneiform have been found in excavations of the Sumerian city of Uruk (in present-day Iraq). Though the tablets date from roughly 3000 B.C., the writing on them uses relatively few pictographs; instead, numerous abstract symbols are used. The sign for “sheep”, for example, is not an by Denise Schmandt-Besserat in her book Before Writing (1992) as overlooked predecessors to the written word.

The earliest of the tokens were simple in form—small cones, spheres, and pyramids—and they were often inscribed. In 1966, a hollow tablet containing several of these tokens was discovered, and more than 100 additional tablets, which are now recognized as sealed envelopes of clay, have since been found. Later envelopes are also as bowls or jars with handles, suggesting that villagers’ crafts were becoming more diversified and sophisticated.

The token system, essentially a system of three- dimensional nouns, was replaced in about 3100 B.C. by a system of marks on clay tablets. A few centuries later, this latter system was to display the first use of numerals, where simple marks coded the concepts of one, two, and so forth. The that denoted oil itself. With three such signs, an abstract and flexible written form had arrived.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

With which one of the following statements regarding the sign for “sheep” (first paragraph) would the author of the passage be

Answer choices

  1. Correct58% picked this

    It could have been replaced without loss of significance by any other sign that was not already being

    Why this is right

    Hahaha, my prediction was WAY off! I would have never predicted this wording. And that's fine. We can aspire to predict but still realize that we're ultimately at the mercy of what answers we're offered. This answer is not supported much by any single sentence in the passage, it's just supported by two things: 1. we know the author considers the sign for "sheep" to be an abstract symbol 2. our common sense would tells us that if you're picking an abstract symbol to represent something, it doesn't matter what it is. If I'm going to label grape jelly with a lightning bolt, it would just as make sense to label it with a pyramid. It's just an abstract symbol that people will learn, by convention, to associate with grape jelly. It always feels unnerving (to me) to pick answer choices that involve adding so much common sense, but modern RC will make us do that sometimes.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong: radically different Opposite13% picked this

    The sign gets its meaning in a radically different way from the way in which the cuneiform sign

    The author is actually presenting the sign for sheep and the one for metal as two similar examples of highly abstract symbols. The "while" being used there is not the contrast-while, but rather the simultaneous-while. Ben cooked dinner, while Kyle set the table.

  3. Out of Scope: causal backstory6% picked this

    The way in which it represents its meaning resulted from the fact that sheep are an agricultural commodity rather than

    We have no idea how a circled cross came to mean "sheep". There's nothing in the passage that suggests that because sheep are an agricultural commodity rather than a product of human industry, that allowed people to see how a circled cross would represent the meaning "sheep". This is sort of the opposite of the correct answer. This answer is making it seem like the symbol for sheep is meaningful and has a causal backstory. The correct answer is recognizing that the author's point is that the sign for sheep is totally arbitrary, just an abstract symbol.

  4. Too Strong17% picked this

    The way in which it represents its meaning was not the subject of scientific scrutiny prior to that

    Too Strong: not until Unsupported: S-B connection This is a very harshly worded claim, and not only do we not know, "no one prior to Schmandt-Besserat ever gave scientific scrutiny to how the sheep sign represented sheep", we don't even know if Schmandt-Besserat ever gave this sign scientific scrutiny. She was studying clay tokens near the Jordan river from 4000 B.C. This sheep sign is from present-day Irag from 3000 B.C.

  5. Too Strong6% picked this

    The abstract nature of the sign reveals a great deal about the political life of the people who used the

    Too Strong: reveals a great deal Out of Scope: political life The author would probably say the abstract nature of the sign reveals that humans already had the abstract writing precursors to the written language by 3000 B.C. (if not earlier). But the author hasn't drawn any connections between the abstract sign and the political life of the people who used cuneiform.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free