Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT146 S4 P3 Q20 Explanation

Clay Tokens

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Hundreds of clay tablets marked in cuneiform have been found in excavations of the Sumerian city of Uruk (in present-day Iraq). Though the tablets date from roughly 3000 B.C., the writing on them uses relatively few pictographs; instead, numerous abstract symbols are used. The sign for “sheep”, for example, is not an by Denise Schmandt-Besserat in her book Before Writing (1992) as overlooked predecessors to the written word.

The earliest of the tokens were simple in form—small cones, spheres, and pyramids—and they were often inscribed. In 1966, a hollow tablet containing several of these tokens was discovered, and more than 100 additional tablets, which are now recognized as sealed envelopes of clay, have since been found. Later envelopes are also as bowls or jars with handles, suggesting that villagers’ crafts were becoming more diversified and sophisticated.

The token system, essentially a system of three- dimensional nouns, was replaced in about 3100 B.C. by a system of marks on clay tablets. A few centuries later, this latter system was to display the first use of numerals, where simple marks coded the concepts of one, two, and so forth. The that denoted oil itself. With three such signs, an abstract and flexible written form had arrived.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

It can be inferred from the discussion of clay tokens in the

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope22% picked this

    there were many tokens that designated more than one type

    Out of Scope: designated more than one We don't hear about any token, in the 2nd paragraph, that stood for more than one idea.

  2. Opposite, if anything6% picked this

    nonagricultural goods and products came to be preferred as contributions to

    The only things we were told was contributed to temple-based pools were grain and livestock, both of which are agricultural goods and products. So we only have opposite-support for the idea that temple-based pools preferred nonagricultural things.

  3. Correct61% picked this

    some later tokens were less abstract than some

    Why this is right

    The earliest tokens (at the beginning of the 2nd paragraph) are just cones, spheres, or pyramids, sometimes inscribed, sometimes blank. If a pyramid represents livestock, for example, that's pretty abstract (i.e. nonrepresentational). Meanwhile, the last sentence in the 2nd paragraph tell us that the forms emerging in the post 4000 B.C. explosion of tokens are figurative -- one has the figure of a bowl. The other has a jar with handles. That's more representational, less abstract. The later token is just showing you, "jar with handles", not asking you to remember that "sphere + two lines on it = jar with handles".

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong2% picked this

    the storage and transportation of liquids were among the most important tasks performed by the

    Too Strong: most important Out of Scope: transporting of liquids The "transporting of liquids" seems like it comes out of left field, but I guess they're playing off the fact that we mentioned bowls and jars with handles, both of which could store or transport liquids. Just because the author pulled two random examples that happen to both be crafts that can hold liquid, we can't assume that storing/moving liquid was among the most important tasks the people in this society performed.

  5. Trap8% picked this

    the token system was as abstract and flexible as later

    Unknown Comparison Too Strong: equally abstract/flexible Nothing in the 2nd paragraph discusses later written languages, so we should be able to get rid of this just because it's clearly out of our Support Window. But even at the end of the 3rd where we talk about the eventual tablet inscriptions being an abstract and flexible written form, we aren't comparing it to later written languages and making the bold claim that this three-sign system was as abstract and as flexible as later languages.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free