Communication Systems

Answer choices

1. A

   Unsupported: bigger science lover2% picked this

   optimistic regarding the ability of science to answer certain

   It would be hard to argue that passage B is more of a believer in the power of science to answer questions. Both authors support their arguments with reference to scientific findings, so they both seem optimistic that science can help us answer this fundamental question about communication. Passage A's 2nd paragraph says, "Research also suggests that ..." Passage B's final sentence says, ".... revealed by recent research".

   2%
2. B

   Correct64% picked this

   disapproving of the approach taken by others writing on the same

   Why this is right

   This matches up with the final paragraph of B, where the author is rolling her eyes at the stupid logic of writers such as Maritain, who "exemplifies this view that conscious intention is a category of mental experience unique to humans". The author of B complains that this common type of argument is circular. Scientists and philosophers are arbitrarily deciding that nonhuman animals don't have conscious intention, and then arguing that human communication is special because it's the only one with conscious intention. The author of B doesn't see how they can be so confident that nonhuman animals don't have conscious intention, or for that matter, that humans do. Passage A doesn't have any criticisms regarding how people writing on animal communication think about or approach this topic, so the fact that B has a criticism makes B more disapproving.

   Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

   64%
3. C

   Out of Scope: accept conflicting positions7% picked this

   open-minded in its willingness to accept the validity of apparently

   The author of B is not willing to accept the validity of the ideas espoused in passage A. She thinks that the view that human communication is special and different because only human communication comes with conscious intention is totally off base. This answer is actually talking about being willing to accept that "A" and "not A" are both valid positions, even though they seem to conflict. Neither author is doing that. That would be like saying, "Sure it's valid to think that only humans have conscious intention, but it's also valid to think that nonhuman animals might also have conscious intention."

   7%
4. D

   Unsupported: more supportive7% picked this

   supportive of ongoing research related to the question

   Just like with (A), it's hard to say that either passage was more supportive of or more believing in science or research. Both passages refer to research. Passage A says "Research also suggests that" and "experiments reveal ..." Passage B ends by citing recent research. The fact that B is the only one that mentions recent research might make us think they care more about ongoing research, but at best we could say that B seems more aware of ongoing research, not more supportive.

   7%
5. E

   Too Strong20% picked this

   circumspect in its refusal to commit itself to any positions with respect to

   Too Strong: refuse to commit to any Out of Scope: still-unsettled research Q's The word "circumspect" means "cautious, measured, wary", but ultimately even if we don't know that word we can judge this answer as being inaccurate based on the fact that it accuses Passage B of "refusing to commit itself to any positions". B's final sentence seems to commit to the position that recent research reveals that there's less of a gap between animal communication and human language than has been previously been perceived. It also commits to the position that we should be questioning whether there's really a qualitative difference between animal and human communication / whether animals are only responding mechanically / whether humans are really speaking with conscious understanding. This answer is tempting because Passage A seems pretty sure that human communication is different and Passage B is more like, "Is it? Maybe we should question the assumptions underlying that." If the answer were saying that Passage B is more "circumspect about whether human communication is qualitatively different from animal communication", then we'd be fine picking it. But it's too strong to say that B "refused to commit to any position".

   20%