Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT144 S4 Q9 Explanation

A manager cannot extract the best

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A manager cannot extract the best performance from employees by threatening them with termination or offering financial rewards for high productivity. Rather, employees must come to want to do a good job for its own sake. One of the best ways for a manager to achieve this decisions that previously had to be made by the manager.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

Which one of the following propositions is best illustrated by the situation described

Answer choices

  1. Bad Effect Match6% picked this

    Increased responsibility can improve a person's sense of how power should

    We're trying to reinforce the idea that giving someone increased responsibility led to them wanting to do a good job for its own sake. This is saying it leads to them having an improved sense of how power should be used.

  2. Out of Scope: prestige5% picked this

    It is often the case that the desire for prestige is more powerful than the

    We're trying to reinforce the idea that giving someone increased responsibility led to them wanting to do a good job for its own sake. We never talked about "prestige" and don't want to stretch what we've read too far. Just because you've been delegated a responsibility doesn't mean you've gotten an uptick in prestige. Also, "often" is a little strong, given that we only have one example being described in this prompt.

  3. Correct71% picked this

    In some cases one's effectiveness in a particular role can be enhanced by a partial

    Why this is right

    This has lovably soft language ("in some cases"), but is otherwise a sneaky one to warm up to. We're trying to reinforce the idea that giving someone increased responsibility led to them wanting to do a good job for its own sake. This is talking about that, but via the manager's perspective. When you delegate to an employee some decisions that previously had to be made by the manager, you've experienced a "partial relinquishing of control". And doing such delegating is one of the best ways to achieve an employee's being motivated to do a good job for its own sake . A manager's job is to extract the best performance from employees, and the key to extracting the best performance is when employees want to do a good job for its own sake. So a manager's effectiveness at extracting the best performance from her employees can be increased by partially relinquishing control and delegating some of her responsibilities to her subordinates. .

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Opposite, if anything3% picked this

    People who carry out decisions are in the best position to determine what those

    Managers are people who carry out decisions, and according to this answer managers are in the best position to determine what those decisions should be. This seems like a mismatch for the paragraph, in which the manager was delegating some of her decisions to her subordinates.

  5. Opposite, if anything15% picked this

    Business works best by harnessing the self-interest of individuals to benefit the company

    We were told that "avoiding getting fired" and "receiving a financial reward" were not good ways to get the best performance from employees, so those sound like techniques in which business doesn't not work best. And yet, those techniques attempt to harness the self-interest of individuals. It's in one's self-interest to not get fired or to receive a financial reward.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free