Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT144 S1 P3 Q17 Explanation

Wampum

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Before contact with Europeans, the Haudenosaune, a group of nations in northeastern North America also known as the Iroquois, had been developing a form of communication, primarily for political purposes, that used wampum, a bead carved from seashell. Most historians have insisted that wampum was primarily a form of money. While wampum distinct nations. Over time wampum came to be used to record and convey key sociopolitical messages.

Wampum came in two colors, white and deep purple. Loose beads constituted the simplest and oldest form of wampum. Even in the form of loose beads, wampum could represent certain basic ideas. For example, white was associated with the sky-yearning spirit, Sapling, whose terrestrial creations, such as trees, were often beneficial to is thought that string wampum was used to send simple political messages such as truce requests.

It was, however, the formation of the Haudenosaune Confederacy from a group of warring tribes, believed by some to have occurred around 1451, that supplied the major impetus for making wampum a deliberate system of both arbitrary and pictorially derived symbols designed primarily for political purposes. This is evident in the invention it served to effectively frame and enforce the law of the confederacy for hundreds of years.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Even if the evolution of wampum had not been altered by the arrival of Europeans, wampum would likely have become a form

    Out of Scope: compactness Unsupported Causal Relationship This answer correctly admits that the arrival of the Europeans seemed played a pretty important causal role in wampum becoming currency. But it adds a causal relationship on top of that, which we can't support anywhere in the passage. It says that because of how compact wampum was, it was destined to be a currency even if the Europeans had never showed up. The passage never mentions how bulky or compact wampum is, so we can't support the claim that wampum's compactness made it likely to become a currency.

  2. Opposite3% picked this

    The use of colors in wampum to express meaning arose in response to the formation

    The earliest, simplest wampum came in two colors, and the different colors stood for different basic ideas. So the use of colors in wampum to express meaning arose way before the formation of the Confederacy. It arose in paragraph 2, not paragraph 3.

  3. Correct80% picked this

    The ancient associations of colors with spirits were important precursors to, and foundations of, later wampum representations that did not depend directly

    Why this is right

    This answer is such a complicated sentence that we should be suspicious that it's correct. The correct answers on What's Implied questions like Opinion and Inference are often aloof, abstract, tortured. Let's try to break apart the multiple claims: 1. the ancient associations of colors with spirits were important precursors to later wampum representations How do we feel about this? Did the author think the stuff in paragraph 2 was an important precursor to the stuff in paragraph 3? Sure! We reminded ourselves that the main point is stressing wampum's "gradual development from objects with religious significance to a method for maintaining peace". If it gradually developed from X to Y, then X was an important precursor to Y. 2. the ancient associations of colors with spirits were important foundations to later wampum representations How do we feel about this? Probably pretty good. Aren't precursors and foundations pretty synonymous? We'd justify this word the same way we justified #1. 3. The later wampum representations (the belt, for example) did not depend directly on the associations of colors with spirits for their meaning. Does that seem right? Sure. The later representations were encoding the freakin' Constitution. It would be hard to believe that the words of the Constitution depended directly on the association between white/Sapling and purple/Flint. In layman's terms, this answer is just saying that "early wampum is crucially connected to later wampum, but later wampum had definitely evolved enough that it was no longer really doing the religious stuff associated with early wampum."

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope11% picked this

    Because the associations with certain colors shifted over time, the same color beads acquired different meanings on belt wampum

    Out of Scope: associations shifted Unsupported Causal Relationship The passage never indicates that the association with colors changed over time. White was associated with Sapling and purple with Flint. As wampum begins to encode truce messages or more complex political messages, we hear that "the arrangements of the two colors directed interpretation of the symbols". But that doesn't mean that white ever stopped being associated with Sapling or that purple ever stopped being associated with Flint. This answer is making a very specific claim that purple/white beads on string wampum meant something different from what purple/white beads on belt wampum meant, and we have no text to support that claim.

  5. Too Speculative5% picked this

    If the Europeans who first began trading with the Haudenosaune had been aware that wampum was used as a means of communication, they would

    This is guessing what Europeans would have done in a counterfactual. If they had realized that wampum wasn't actually currency but communication within Haudenosaune, would they have refrained from using it as a medium of exchange? We don't know how the author would feel about that counterfactual. The Europeans might still have tried to trade for wampum, if wampum was pretty/exotic/enticing. They might have still tried to turn wampum into currency because the Europeans were more familiar with a currency based system than a barter system.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free