Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT143 S4 Q8 Explanation

The giant Chicxulub crater

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The giant Chicxulub crater in Mexico provides indisputable evidence that a huge asteroid, about six miles across, struck Earth around the time many of the last dinosaur species were becoming extinct. But this catastrophe was probably not responsible for most of these extinctions. Any major asteroid strike kills many organisms in or Chicxulub crater were made during times in Earth’s history when there were no known extinctions.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken

Answer choices

  1. Too Weak5% picked this

    The vast majority of dinosaur species are known to have gone extinct well before the time of the asteroid impact

    This feels like more than nothing. If there aren't that many dino species left to kill, then it's easier for an asteroid to kill off most of the remaining. But we still need to know that most of the remaining ones were congregating near the impact site, or else we haven't really escaped the author's "local, not global extinctions" argument.

  2. No Impact2% picked this

    The size of a crater caused by an asteroid striking Earth generally depends on both the size of that asteroid and

    Ha ^ (pun intended?) We need a storyline that sells us on the idea that this asteroid was a dino-killer, and this is a wishy-washy physics statement about all asteroids.

  3. Too Weak18% picked this

    Fossils have been discovered of a number of dinosaurs that clearly died as a result of the asteroid impact

    This certainly explicitly reads as "dino-killer", but the author was never denying that many dinosaurs would have been killed by the impact. He's just saying that global extinctions wouldn't be attributable to the impact. This answer is consistent with the author's argument, since the fossils might all belong to dinosaurs that lived in that area. This answer doesn't say that "a number of dinosaurs went extinct".

  4. No Impact4% picked this

    There is no evidence that any other asteroid of equal size struck Earth at the same time as the asteroid

    Okay, pun also intended, but it's less fun the second time. No one is expecting a 2nd big asteroid to have hit Earth at the same time as this one. We only get hit by those asteroids once every 100 million years or so. The author is cool with this asteroid being the only one. He isn't blaming the dinosaur extinctions on other asteroid impacts. He's saying that asteroid impacts aren't the type of thing that can cause global extinctions.

  5. Correct72% picked this

    During the period immediately before the asteroid that produced the Chicxulub crater struck, most of the world’s dinosaurs lived in or near the

    Why this is right

    Oh, my goodness, it was the "Dinosaur Burning Man" story line for real! Right before the asteroid hit, the dinosaurs had all met up for some "last dinos on earth" Fyre Fest (literally), and they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. This answer allows us to argue how a local impact could have still led to many extinctions.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free