Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT142 S1 Q13 Explanation

Community organizations wanting to enhance

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Community organizations wanting to enhance support for higher education programs need to convince the public that such programs benefit society as a whole. Taking this approach makes the public more receptive. It is much easier, for example, to get the public to support road building, which is seen as benefiting everyone, than are seen as benefiting only a relatively small segment of society.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn

Answer choices

  1. Correct73% picked this

    Community organizations seeking to encourage higher education programs must persuade the public that these programs benefit

    Why this is right

    This matches the meaning of the 1st sentence very well. We can appreciate the care they took to use their thesaurus and integrate some synonyms in here. "wanting to enhance support" vs. "seeking to encourage" "need to convince the public" vs. "must persuade the public"

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Premise Last Claim Trap7% picked this

    It is easier to get the public to support programs that are seen as benefiting everyone than it is to get them to support

    This was a supporting detail, which is indicated by the fact that it was prefaced by for example. We should always feel suspicious of ourselves if we're picking an answer on Main Conclusion that matches the final claim of the paragraph, since the conclusion usually isn't found there on Main Conclusion but they always have a trap answer for people who will just assume the last claim is the conclusion.

  3. Relative vs. Absolute Unrelated to Goal0% picked this

    It is easy to get the public to support road building, because road building is seen as benefiting

    This looks nothing like the first sentence, so we can reject it without reading it. If we did read it, we would see that it's not even correctly reproducing any claim from the argument. We were told that "it is easier" (relative) to get people to support stuff that seems to benefit society as a whole, not that "it is easy" (absolute).

  4. Intermediate Conclusion19% picked this

    Convincing the public that higher education programs will benefit society as a whole makes the public more

    This answer replicates the meaning of the 2nd sentence, which was an intermediate conclusion. We're looking for an answer that matches the 1st sentence, which is the main conclusion

  5. Unstated Claim Unrelated to Goal0% picked this

    Higher education is similar to road building in that both are beneficial to society

    This looks nothing like the first sentence, so we can reject it as soon as we make that assessment. It also is not a claim from the argument, so it couldn't be citing our main conclusion, because our main conclusion is a claim in the argument. This answer is trying to temp people by saying something that feels like an Inference or Assumption (in other words, they're hoping people will pick it because it feels like a correct answer, on a different question type).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free