Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S3 P3 Q20 Explanation

Happiness and Wealth

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMethodSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Research concerning happiness and wealth reveals a paradox: at any one time richer people report higher levels of happiness than poorer people in the same society report, and yet over time advanced societies have not grown happier as they have grown richer. Apparently, people are comparing their income with with actual income. Two phenomena—habituation and rivalry—push up the norm.

When our living standards increase, we love it initially but then we adjust and it makes little difference. For example, if we ask people with different incomes what income they consider sufficient, the “required income” correlates strongly with their actual income: a rise in actual income causes a roughly equivalent rise in on the absolute level of wages but rises if wages rapidly increase.

We do not have the same experience with other aspects of our lives. We do not foresee how we adjust to material possessions, so we the expense of leisure.

Now consider the phenomenon of rivalry. In a study conducted by Solnick and Hemenway, people were asked to choose between prices held constant:

A. You earn $50,000 a year while everyone $25,000;

B. You earn $100,000 a year while others

The majority chose the first. They were happy to be poorer, provided position improved.

And indeed, how people compare to their “reference group”—those most like them—is crucial for happiness. In East Germany, for example, living standards have soared since 1990, but the level of happiness has plummeted because people now than with people in other Soviet bloc countries.

Passage B Does the Solnick and Hemenway study mean that we care most about one-upmanship? Perhaps out of our primeval past comes the urge to demonstrate our superiority in order to help ensure mating prospects, keeping our genetic lines going. Still from having a bigger house than our neighbors.

This theory may sound good and is commonly heard, but it is not the explanation best supported by the evidence. Rather, the data show that earning more makes people happier because relative prosperity successful, that they have created value.

If two people feel equally successful, they will be equally happy even if their incomes differ greatly. Of course, people who earn more generally view themselves as successful. But it is the success—not the money per se—that provides the happiness. We use material wealth but that we are prosperous because we create value.

What scholars often portray as an ignoble tendency—wanting to have more than others—is really evidence of a desire to create value. Wanting to create value benefits that it also brings happiness.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

In arguing for their respective positions, the author of passage A and the author of passage B both do which

Answer choices

  1. Not Passage A5% picked this

    explain a phenomenon by pointing to its

    While Passage B definitely delves into our primordial past, but Passage A doesn't say anything about evolutionary biology.

  2. Too Strong for Either3% picked this

    endorse a claim simply because it is

    "Endorse a claim simply because it's widely believed" is a damning accusation. It would be a weird correct answer, because it sounds more like a Flaw answer choice. Both passages had some data, some studies, some research to go along with their claims. Neither was ever saying, "Most people think X, so X is true."

  3. Not Passage A6% picked this

    accept a claim for the sake

    We might say that Passage B is doing this in its first paragraph. Normally, "accept a claim for the sake of argument" would sound something like this: Suppose we were the last two people on Earth, then would you date me, Kelly? The first paragraph of Passage B doesn't use quite that structure, but it's pondering a possible storyline for the S&H study, so it feels in the neighborhood of "Suppose ... " perhaps out of our primeval past comes the urge to demonstrate superiority But Passage A doesn't seem to have anything like this.

  4. Not in Passage B39% picked this

    attempt to resolve an apparent

    Passage A does try to resolve a paradox: GIVEN THAT richer ppl report more happiness than poorer people, within any given society HOW CAN IT BE THAT as societies get richer, they do not get happier The author resolves it with "habituation and rivalry". Passage B, though, does not as clearly have a paradox to solve. Its author just thinks there's more than one way to interpret the S&H study, and she argues that one explanation is better supported than another. That's not resolving a paradox; it's just arguing for a preferred explanation. What's annoying is that the study's results are themselves somewhat paradoxical: given that people would make less money with option A, why is it that the majority of people prefer option A? But Passage B is taking it as a given that people want relative prosperity. They want to make more than their neighbors. Passage B is only trying to address why that's the case: "It's not because of X. It's because of Y." It's more just an Explain Curious Fact purpose, not resolving a paradox. There's a difference between solving a causal mystery and a paradox. They both have something confusing that needs to be explained, but a paradox has some countervailing idea that goes in the opposite direction. CAUSAL MYSTERY Why is Ben so sad tonight? PARADOX Given that Ben just won the lottery, why is he so sad tonight? Passage B never addresses the idea that in Option A people make less money in absolute terms (the countervailing idea that makes the study's results paradoxical). Psg B only goes after explaining why people want to make more money than their peers.

  5. Correct47% picked this

    assert that their positions are supported

    Why this is right

    Here's our best available answer. Passage B is arguing that the correct way to interpret the S&H study is to think that people prefer relative prosperity because it makes them feel like they have created value. The beginning of B's 2nd paragraph says that the alternate explanation "is not the explanation best supported by the evidence. Rather, the data show that ..." Passage A does not have anything that matches that explicitness of asserting that its position is supported by data, but it does support its position with data. Passage A's position is that "habituation and rivalry" are why societies don't seem to get happier as they get richer. It has phrases indicating supporting data such as, - "For example, if we ask people ..." - "We can also look at reported happiness over time" - "In a study conducted by S&H" - "In East Germany, for example ..."

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free