Reading Comprehension

PT141 · S3 · P2 · Q11 Katherine Dunham

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the more striking developments in modern North American dance was African American choreographer Katherine Dunham’s introduction of a technique known as dance-isolation, in which one part of the body moves in one rhythm while other parts are kept stationary or are moved in different rhythms.

Topic

Katherine Dunham’s influence on modern North American dance through her introduction of dance-isolation and adaptation of Caribbean and African dance forms.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Katherine Dunham, drawing on her dual backgrounds as an anthropologist and choreographer, revolutionized North American dance by introducing dance-isolation and incorporating traditional dance forms from African, Caribbean, and Pacific cultures, laying the groundwork for greater recognition of African American dance. The Most Valuable Sentence appears at the end of paragraph 1:

P1: Introduction of Dance-Isolation and Dunham’s Unique Perspective

Katherine Dunham’s key innovation, dance-isolation, brought a new movement technique from African, Caribbean, and Pacific cultures into the mainstream of North American dance. Her ability to do so is attributed to her background in both anthropology and choreography.

P2: Status of Dance Research before Dunham / Challenges

Before Dunham, dance was largely ignored by social researchers due to a lack of credibility in the field and a shortage of scholars trained in both dance and research. Dunham was exceptional because she understood both worlds.

P3: Dunham’s Research Methods and Impact

Dunham began studying traditional Caribbean dance in 1935, bucking the academic trend of detached observation by immersing herself physically in the dances. By participating directly, she both understood the cultural context and learned to teach these techniques, eventually blending them into ballet.

11.

In the last sentence of the second paragraph, the author mentions "experts in dance" primarily in order to

  1. suggest why a group of

    Wrong Role

    This feels pretty close, because social scientists did not embrace the study of dance, which is a particular cultural form. And that is the big idea we're trying to connect back to. But the detail we're being asked about is where we were told that "dance experts weren't trained in social science". This answer is saying, "The fact that dance experts weren't trained in social science suggests why scientists didn't study dance." Huh? "The fact that dance experts weren't trained in social science" explains why dancers didn't study dance as social scientists. It doesn't seem to have any direct causal effect on whether scientists choose to study dance. (the reason why scientists didn't study dance is because they weren't sufficiently trained in dance, not because dance experts were un-trained in social science).

    2% picked this

  2. suggest that a certain group

    Contradicted: more qualified

    The passage is saying that scientists and dance experts were equally unqualified to study dance. (Technically, it's not saying "equally unqualified", but we have no basis for elevating either party over the other as more qualified). Both scientists and dance experts had 1 of the 2 things needed to study dance.

    5% picked this

  3. identify an additional factor that

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: motivating Dunham Unsupported Causal Relationship This answer is saying, "The fact that dance experts didn't know social science well enough to study dance is one of the things that motivated Dunham to pursue dance ethnology." We don't have anything in the 2nd paragraph that connects "dance experts' inability to study dance as a social science" to "Dunham's motivation to study it". The passage never says that she surveyed the social science landscape, saw there were no studies of dance (since both scientists and dance experts were both unable to properly tackle it), and became motivated to study it herself.

    8% picked this

  4. Correct

    contribute to an explanation of

    Why this is right

    We were hoping for something like "complete her explanation of why previously dance had been neglected as an area of social research". That's what this is saying. The fact that "dance experts didn't know social science well enough to study dance" combines with "social scientists didn't know dance well enough to study dance" in order to explain why "Previously, dance had been neglected as an area of social research". When we pick our correct answer on Local Purpose, we love to see language that matches up with a framing idea one or two sentences prior.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    83% picked this

  5. indicate an additional possible reason

    Out of Scope: tension

    This answer is suggesting that there are multiple reasons why there's tension between dance experts and social scientists, but the passage is never saying that members of each of those two fields feel tension with members of the other field.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free