Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S1 P3 Q20 Explanation

Advertising Criticisms

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Some critics of advertising have assumed that the creation of false needs in consumers is the principal mechanism underlying what these critics regard as its manipulative and hegemonic power. Central to this type of critique are the writings of political theorist Herbert Marcuse, who maintained that modern people succumb to oppression by to the genuine well-being of consumers, but rather to the profit—and thereby the disproportionate power—of corporations.

Marcuse supposed that we all have certain real needs, both physical and psychological. Advertising appropriates these needs for its own purposes, forging psychological associations between them and consumer items, e.g., between sex and perfume, thereby creating a false “need” for these items. Since the quest for fulfillment is thus displaced from its never really fulfilled and the consumer remains at some level unsatisfied.

Unfortunately, the distinction between real and false needs upon which this critique depends is extremely problematic. If Marcusians are right, we cannot, with any assurance, separate our real needs from the alleged false needs we feel as a result of the manipulation of advertisers. For, in order to do so, it would society that they have come to inform our instinctive judgments about things.

But, in fact, Marcusians make a major mistake in assuming that the majority of consumers who respond to advertising do not do so autonomously. Advertising techniques are unable to induce unwilling behavior in rational, informed adults, and regulations prohibit misinformation in advertising claims. Moreover, evidence suggests that most adults understand and recognize fulfillment, or even that its genuine fulfillment of needs must be less than the advertisement suggests.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

By the term "forces of persuasion" (third paragraph), the author most probably

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported: intentionally dishonest claims12% picked this

    intentionally dishonest claims that some theorists argue are common

    Do they create false needs in us? Yes. But do they do so by making claims that are intentionally dishonest? We don't know.

  2. Unsupported: Not About Us7% picked this

    innate, instinctual drives that some theorists say are fundamental to

    We're looking for "the manipulation of advertisers". They are the forces of persuasion, not the instinctive voices in our head.

  3. Unsupported: Not About Society14% picked this

    emotional pressures that some theorists claim are exerted over individuals by society

    We're looking for "the manipulation of advertisers". They are the forces of persuasion, not society as a whole.

  4. Unsupported: Not About the State3% picked this

    subtle practices of social indoctrination that some theorists say are sponsored

    We're looking for "the manipulation of advertisers". They are the forces of persuasion, not state-sponsored social indoctrination.

  5. Correct64% picked this

    manipulative influences that some theorists say go unrecognized by those affected

    Why this is right

    We're looking for "the manipulation of advertisers". This talks about a manipulative influence. Why doesn't it say advertisers? Because they don't want the correct answer to be that easy. Does the manipulative influence of advertisers go unrecognized by those affected by them, according to some theorists? Kind of. "If Marcusians are right, we cannot, with any assurance, separate our real needs from the alleged false needs we feel as a result of the manipulation of advertisers". That implies that Marcusians are theorists who think we can't reliable distinguish between real and false needs, which implies that we can't recognize which needs were our true needs to begin with, and which needs have been instilled in us via the forces of advertising. We don't recognize, in other words, that when we go to buy that perfume we really want that we're acting on a false need that Madison Ave has instilled in our psyche.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free