Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S1 P3 Q19 Explanation

Advertising Criticisms

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Some critics of advertising have assumed that the creation of false needs in consumers is the principal mechanism underlying what these critics regard as its manipulative and hegemonic power. Central to this type of critique are the writings of political theorist Herbert Marcuse, who maintained that modern people succumb to oppression by to the genuine well-being of consumers, but rather to the profit—and thereby the disproportionate power—of corporations.

Marcuse supposed that we all have certain real needs, both physical and psychological. Advertising appropriates these needs for its own purposes, forging psychological associations between them and consumer items, e.g., between sex and perfume, thereby creating a false “need” for these items. Since the quest for fulfillment is thus displaced from its never really fulfilled and the consumer remains at some level unsatisfied.

Unfortunately, the distinction between real and false needs upon which this critique depends is extremely problematic. If Marcusians are right, we cannot, with any assurance, separate our real needs from the alleged false needs we feel as a result of the manipulation of advertisers. For, in order to do so, it would society that they have come to inform our instinctive judgments about things.

But, in fact, Marcusians make a major mistake in assuming that the majority of consumers who respond to advertising do not do so autonomously. Advertising techniques are unable to induce unwilling behavior in rational, informed adults, and regulations prohibit misinformation in advertising claims. Moreover, evidence suggests that most adults understand and recognize fulfillment, or even that its genuine fulfillment of needs must be less than the advertisement suggests.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Which one of the following is a claim that the author attributes

Answer choices

  1. Correct42% picked this

    In modern society, advertising helps lead people to think that they

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the 2nd and 3rd sentences of the first paragraph. In the 2nd sentence, Marcuse believes that, modern people end up getting oppressed because they believe themselves satisfied (despite living in an objectively unsatisfying world). In the 3rd sentence, This process occurs because the techniques of advertising create "needs" that are false. Marcuse is essentially sketching out a causal chain (and the passage is reporting it in reverse chronological order). 1. ads create "false needs" in the minds of modern consumers 2. consumers believe they need a certain product to feel satisfied 3. consumers by that product and then convince themselves (ever so briefly), "NOW, I'm satisfied", even though they live in an objectively unsatisfying world. 4. the product doesn't contribute to their genuine well-being, so the consumers soon feel unsatisfied again and buy another product to fill that false need 5. they have thus succumbed to oppression by their corporate overlords What is confusing and frustrating about this answer is that at the end of the 2nd paragraph, we're spelling out that "the consumer remains at some level unsatisfied". However, we're meant to hear that as, "subconsciously, there's still something off, which creates a hunger to buy more products". We know this is at a subconscious level because Marcuse says in that 2nd sentence of the passage that "modern people believe themselves satisfied". The passage doesn't explicitly state some of the things in the causal chain I just delineated. It seems like LSAC wanted us to use our common sense understanding of how advertising and product-buying works to fill in some blanks. When I was a kid, and I would see a commercial for Transformers, I would then have a burning "false need" for a Transformers toy. If I were to get that toy, I would briefly feel tons of satisfaction. After a spell of days or weeks or months, though, my subconscious would realize that Optimus Prime did not fill my emotional void and I would be wanting a new toy.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Unsupported Comparison: modern vs. early2% picked this

    Modern societies differ from earlier societies in that they fail to satisfy

    The fact that this passage discusses modern people does not allow us to just infer some opposite thing about earlier societies. Marcuse believes that the world is "objectively unsatisfying", so he could believe that earlier societies also failed to satisfy basic physical needs; they were just clear-eyed about the natural state of the world rather than deluding themselves with consumerism.

  3. Wrong Point of View23% picked this

    It is impossible to draw any meaningful distinction between real and false psychological needs

    This is what the author is stressing in her objection to Marcuse. She says, "If Marcusians are correct, then [this problematic idea follows]." She isn't saying that Marcusians believe this claim. She thinks that Marcusian criticism depends on a distinction between false needs and real needs. She is saying, "If they are correct about the other stuff they say, then it would imply this idea (that undermines their view)." If they're correct in thinking that advertising is so good at brainwashing us that we can't tell false needs from genuine needs, then how would we, as Marcusian sociologists, decide on which needs are false and which are genuine? After all, our brains have been corrupted by advertising just as much as anyone's, so we no longer would have any way of distinguishing real from false.

  4. Out of Scope: totalitarian systems6% picked this

    Advertising in modern society has sometimes become a tool of oppression working to the benefit

    We talk about oppression and the hegemonic (dominant) power of advertising. But the passage never discusses totalitarian political systems (ones in which a dictator / autocrat has firm control over the country).

  5. Opposite: real needs27% picked this

    Advertising exploits basic human needs by deriving from them certain secondary needs which, though they become real needs, subtly work

    Marcuse is never saying that advertising creates "real needs", even if we demote them to secondary status. His whole critique is centered on the idea of "false needs".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free