Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT140 S4 P3 Q19 Explanation

The Origins of Superior Performance

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In certain fields of human endeavor, such as music, chess, and some athletic activities, the performance of the best practitioners is so outstanding, so superior even to the performance of other highly experienced individuals in the field, that some people believe some notion of innate talent must be invoked to account for exceptional athletic performance, including superior motor coordination, speed of reflexes, and hand-eye coordination, can be inborn.

Until recently, however, little systematic research was done on the topic of superior performance, and previous estimates of the heritability of traits relevant to performance were based almost exclusively on random samples of the general population rather than on studies of highly trained superior performers as compared with the general population. Recent memory for configurations of chess pieces, but only if those configurations are typical of chess games.

The vast majority of exceptional adult performers were not exceptional as children, but started instruction early and improved their performance through sustained high-level training. Only extremely rarely is outstanding performance achieved without at least ten years of intensive, deliberate practice. With such intensive training, chess players who may not have superior innate capacity and the percentage of muscle fibers, show specific changes that develop from extended intense training.

The evidence does not, therefore, support the claim that a notion of innate talent must be invoked in order to account for the difference between good and outstanding performance, since it suggests instead that extended intense training, together with that level of talent common to all reasonably competent performers, may suffice to motivational factors are more likely to be effective predictors of superior performance than is innate talent.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

The passage says that superior chess players do not have exceptional memory for which one

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: sequences of moves53% picked this

    some sequences of moves that are typical of games other

    We're looking for "configurations of pieces" (i.e. where the pieces are distributed on the board), not the way they move from space to space over the course of a sequence of moves.

  2. Out of Scope7% picked this

    some types of complex sequences without

    Out of Scope: complex sequence w/o spatial We have a really narrow support idea to work with (atypical configuration of chess pieces), and so if the language of the answer isn't anywhere near that, we're moving on.

  3. Out of Scope: unchallenging games1% picked this

    some chess games that have not been

    We have a really narrow support idea to work with (atypical configuration of chess pieces). This is talking about "games of chess that were easy for them to win", which seems miles away from "atypical configuration of chess pieces".

  4. Correct34% picked this

    some kinds of arrangements of chess

    Why this is right

    We were looking for "atypical configurations of chess pieces". Configuration = arrangement So this matches what the passage told us. Superior chess players do not have exceptional memory for some kinds of arrangements of chess pieces (the kind of arrangements they don't have good memory for = arrangements that do not typically occur during chess games)

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope5% picked this

    some types of factors requiring logical analysis in the absence

    Out of Scope: complex sequence w/o spatial We have a really narrow support idea to work with (atypical configuration of chess pieces). "Factors requiring logical analysis in the absence of competition" doesn't sound anything like "the pieces are placed on the board in a weird way that usually wouldn't happen during a chess game".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free