Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT140 S2 Q13 Explanation

Consultant: The dramatic improvements

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Consultant: The dramatic improvements in productivity achieved during the Industrial Revolution resulted in large part from standardization of processes and procedures coupled with centralization of planning and decision making. Yet, in recent years, many already productive companies have further improved their productivity decision making and in how they do their work.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox in

Answer choices

  1. Reinforces Background7% picked this

    Most companies still try to improve productivity mainly through greater standardization and centralization

    This helps to sustain the background ... "We weren't lying when we said that standardization and centralization are good. Most companies still aim for those things!" But this does nothing to explain the surprising foreground, which is about how companies are going in the opposite direction to boost productivity.

  2. Doesn't Address Paradox11% picked this

    Increased productivity is not the only benefit of giving individual employees greater control over their work; job

    If the paradox were "why are these companies bothering to de-centralize and empower individual employees?", then this answer would add another log to the fire: well, we already heard it boosted productivity, but it also increases job satisfaction But the paradox we're trying to solve is, "how does it boost productivity? We though the opposite (more central planning) led to dramatic boosts in productivity."

  3. No Impact8% picked this

    Most of the increases in industrial productivity that have occurred in recent years have been due to the introduction of

    This doesn't give us any way to explain how giving more control to individual employees led to a boost in productivity. It's about robots.

  4. No Impact6% picked this

    The innovations of the Industrial Revolution are only now being applied in those companies in which individual employees have traditionally been entirely in control

    This doesn't give us any way to explain how certain companies have giving more control to individual employees, leading to a boost in productivity. This answer is talking about companies whose employees have previously been entirely in control. These companies are only now installing the ideas from the Industrial Revolution, so they are starting to become more centrally controlled. Our job is to explain why certain companies who are starting to become less centrally controlled are being more productive.

  5. Correct68% picked this

    Increases in productivity in highly productive companies depend on management's broad application of innovative ideas solicited from individual

    Why this is right

    This gives us a way to explain how an already-productive (i.e. "highly productive") company could give individual employees more decision making power and see a productivity boost as a result. Apparently, once you've got a highly productive company (say, for example, that you've already maxed out all the efficiency gains of assembly lines and central planning), then any further increases in productivity will depend on innovative ideas solicited from individual employees about their work. The management then has to broadly apply these ideas. So by getting a good mix of central planning and some employee empowerment, you get individual employees generating innovative ideas and then sharing them with management who can then broadly apply.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free