Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT140 S1 Q24 Explanation

Pediatrician: Swollen tonsils give

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Pediatrician: Swollen tonsils give rise to breathing problems during sleep, and the surgical removal of children's swollen tonsils has been shown to alleviate sleep disturbances. So removing children's tonsils before swelling even occurs will experience any breathing problems during sleep.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

The pediatrician's argument is most vulnerable to the criticism

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Flaw1% picked this

    relies on an inappropriate appeal to

    This is the famous Inappropriate Appeal flaw, but this argument didn't rely on a dubious expert.

  2. Wrong Flaw5% picked this

    relies on an assumption that is tantamount to assuming that the

    This describes the famous Circular Reasoning flaw, in which the evidence restates the conclusion or assumes the conclusion is true. But we're not critiquing this argument by saying that the author's evidence involves repeating or already-believing the conclusion. We're saying the author only managed to prove that preemptively removing tonsils would make children less likely to experience breathing problems during sleep; she didn't prove that kids would never have breathing problems. The author relies on the assumption that "swollen tonsils are the only possible source of breathing problems", and that does not match her conclusion. (tantamount = essentially the same as) I could say, "Asking Jill to move in with me was tantamount to proposing that she marry me."

  3. Wrong Flaw12% picked this

    infers from the fact that an action has a certain effect that the action is intended

    This refers to the famous Intent vs. Result flaw, in which authors conflate whether or not an action was intended to do X with whether or not the action had the consequence of doing X. We definitely weren't complaining about that kind of switch.

  4. Not an Objection4% picked this

    fails to consider the possibility that there may be other medical reasons for surgically removing

    Since this starts with fails to consider, we can ask ourselves, "Would it weaken the argument to tell the author that there may be other reasons to remove tonsils?" Nope. It would only hurt the author if we said, "there may be other medical conditions that give rise to breathing problems at night."

  5. Correct77% picked this

    fails to consider the possibility that some breathing problems during sleep may be caused by something

    Why this is right

    Since this starts with fails to consider, we can ask ourselves, "Would it weaken the argument to tell the author that there may be other causes of breathing problems during sleep?" Sure! The author thinks that as soon as we surgically remove the possibility of swollen tonsils, we have guaranteed that kids won't experience any breathing problems during sleep, but we could call that conclusion highly into question by reminding the author, "Yo --- there are other potential causes of breathing problems. Even if little Johnny doesn't have breathing problems from swollen tonsils anymore, he still might have them from his asthma."

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free