Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT140 S1 Q17 Explanation

If a motor is sound-insulated

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

If a motor is sound-insulated, then it is quiet enough to use in home appliances. If a motor is quiet enough to use in home appliances, then it can be used in institutional settings. None of are quiet enough to use in home appliances.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must

Answer choices

  1. Reversed Logic4% picked this

    If a motor can be used in institutional settings, then it

    We know this: insulated → quiet enough → used in institutional This answer is acting like we know this: used in institutional → insulated That's moving illegally backwards.

  2. Correct59% picked this

    None of the motors manufactured by EM Industries

    Why this is right

    The last sentence says manufactured → not quiet enough by EM Industries for home appliances The first sentence says not quiet enough → not sound for home appliances insulated If we put those two ideas together, we get made by → not quiet → not sound EM enough 4 home insulated

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Almost Contradicted2% picked this

    At least some of the motors manufactured by EM Industries can be used

    The only way we have available to prove that something can be used in institutional settings is to establish that "it's quiet enough to use in home appliances". But we were told that none of the EM motors are quiet enough to use in home appliances, so we don't have any way to prove that they can be used in institutional settings. Some people may have picked this out of confusion based on our chain: can't be used → not quiet enough → not sound in instit. settings for home apps insulated But there's no way to derive that some EM motors (all of which are not quiet enough) can be used in institutional settings.

  4. Reversed Logic4% picked this

    If a motor is quiet enough to use in home appliances, then

    This just reads the first sentence in an illegal backwards motion. Given If Don is in Texas, then Don is in America. that doesn't prove that If Don is in America, Don is in Texas. We were told if sound insulated, then quiet enough and this answer is pretending we can derive if quiet enough, then sound insulated

  5. Opposite Logic30% picked this

    None of the motors manufactured by EM Industries can be used

    We weren't given any way to prove that something can't be used in institutional settings, only a way to prove that something can be used. We might pick this out of confusion about what we can infer out of the contrapositive chain: can't be used → not quiet enough → not sound in instit. settings for home apps insulated Given a chain like, ~A → ~B → ~C If we say "none of the motors from EM are B", then we can say motor from EM → ~B → ~C But we can't infer anything backwards to know anything about A. We know that none of the EM motors are quiet enough, but this answer is assuming that "if you're not quiet enough, then you can't be used in institutional settings". We were only told, "if you are quiet enough, then you can be used".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free