Logical Reasoning

PT140 · S1 · Q15 Greatly exceeding the recommended

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Greatly exceeding the recommended daily intake of vitamins A and D is dangerous, for they can be toxic at high levels.

Information

Causal Greatly exceeding dangerously recommended daily ⇢ toxic intake of vitamins A

Pivot for some foods, one "serving" has 100% of the recommended daily intake but many people overestimate what counts as a "serving", thereby consuming two to three times that much.

Evaluate

There are definitely overlapping ideas: recommended daily intake comes up multiple times, and so does standard servings.

The standard serving is 100% of the recommended daily intake, but many people are having 2x or 3x a standard serving, so they'd be getting 200-300% of the recommended daily intake.

This feels like it matches up with the Causal idea from the first sentence. If they're getting 200-300% of the recommended daily intake, are they "greatly exceeding the recommended daily intake"?

Yeah, that seems fair. So are they eating toxic levels of these vitamins?

Yeah, maybe!

Goal

The correct answer will probably reinforce putting together the ideas that people, by overestimating what counts as a standard serving, are probably consuming vitamins A and D in somewhat toxic levels.

15.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

  1. Few people who consume vitamin-fortified

    Too Strong/Specific: few people

    Does this paragraph tell us whether less than 50% of people are aware of the recommended daily intake of vitamins A and D? No. We know that many people are unaware of what constitutes a standard serving. But we don't know what people's awareness level is of the recommended daily intake of these vitamins.

    9% picked this

  2. Correct

    Some people who consume vitamin-fortified

    Why this is right

    This has lovably weak, provable language: some A standard serving of some foods fortified with vitamins A and D contains 100% of the recommended daily intake of those vitamins. Since many people consume two to three times the standard serving of these vitamin-fortified food, they exceed the recommended daily intake of vitamins A and D.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    75% picked this

  3. Some people mistakenly believe it

    Out of Scope: believe it's healthy

    We don't have any information relating to what people believe about consuming more than the recommended daily intake. The passage isn't saying they consume two to three times the standard serving because they believe that this would be healthy. It's saying that they consume that much because they don't realize that a standard serving is actually only about 1/2 or 1/3 as much as they're estimating it is.

    6% picked this

  4. Most people who eat vitamin-fortified

    Too Strong: most / should

    There's nothing in this paragraph that allows us to talk about more than 50% of people. We only hear that "many people" overestimate a standard serving. There also isn't any "should", although Most Supported questions will sometimes go from saying something is toxic / dangerous to saying, in a correct answer, that we should not do that. This answer is appealing on a common sense level, because we might think, "People eating vitamin-fortified foods are already screwing up by exceeding the recommended daily intake. They shouldn't make the situation even worse by taking vitamin supplements on top of that." But we don't know that most (more than 50%) of people who eat vitamin-fortified foods are already screwing up by eating more than the recommended daily intake. We only know that's true for many people (at least 10 ppl). Also, even for these many people, it's extreme to say they shouldn't take any vitamin supplements, since we're only worried about them piling on to their excess of vitamin A and D. We don't have any problem with them taking Vitamin C or E supplements, if those vitamins weren't in their vitamin-fortified food in the first place.

    4% picked this

  5. Manufacturers are unaware that many

    Out of Scope: manufacturers' awareness

    It might be natural to derive a big inference from this paragraph like, "Oh, no, people who are eating 2-3x as much cereal as they're supposed to are overeating vitamins to toxic levels" and then think, "Wow, someone should tell cereal manufacturers about this. They must be unaware." But that is way too much speculation on our part. These Inference questions are about finding the most derivable answer choice. The claim that could best be proven in court, based only on the evidence in the paragraph (+ our common sense). Manufacturers could be aware of this phenomenon; it doesn't offend common sense. After all, glue manufacturers can be aware that some people huff glue. They can put on their products warnings like, "Don't huff this", but they're still going to put out their product and let people take personal responsibility for any abuse or misuse of the product.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free