Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT140 S1 Q12 Explanation

Climatologist: Over the coming century (copy)

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Climatologist: Over the coming century, winter temperatures are likely to increase in the Rocky Mountains due to global warming. This will cause a greater proportion of precipitation to fall as rain instead of snow. Therefore, the mountain snowpack will probably melt more rapidly and flooding and less storable water to meet summer demands.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the

Answer choices

  1. Weakens12% picked this

    Global warming will probably cause a substantial increase in the average amount of annual precipitation in the Rocky

    If there is a lot more precipitation, then even though a smaller proportion falls as snow, there still might be just as much snow as before. i.e. maybe the precipitation used to be 50% snow, 50% rain, and global warming will change that to be 40% snow, 60% rain, but 40% of a bigger number can still be at least as big as 50% of a smaller number.

  2. Correct52% picked this

    In other mountainous regions after relatively mild winters, the melting of snowpacks has led to greater spring flooding and less storable water, on average,

    Why this is right

    This is a "More Cause, More Effect" plausibility strengthener for the author's prediction. It provides data points showing that in other areas, the supposed cause (warming temps in a mountainous region) led to some of the predicted effects (the melting caused greater spring flooding and less storable water). This doesn't address the "melting more rapidly / earlier" part of the prediction, but a Strengthen answer doesn't have to be perfect. It just has to beat the other answers.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Weak26% picked this

    On average, in areas of the Rocky Mountains in which winters are relatively mild, there is less storable water to meet summer demands than

    This answer ends up going head-to-head with (B), for a lot of us. It also has the feel of More Cause / More Effect data points: It's associating the supposed cause (relatively mild winters) with some of the predicted effect (less storable water). But it's just not as strong a strengthener as (B). They both deal with the concept of milder vs. colder winters. (B) deals with entire mountainous regions changing from colder to milder. (C) deals with individual patches within a mountainous regions being colder vs. milder. (B) wins that battle, since the author's argument is about an entire mountain region changing from one climate to another. (B)'s match for the predicted effects is "melting snowpack led to more spring flooding and less storable water" (C)'s match for the predicted effects is just "less storable water". So (B) wins that battle too, since it deals with spring flooding and since it deals with the causal idea that melting snowpack led to these changes.

  4. Too Weak6% picked this

    On average, in the regions of the world with the mildest winters, there is more spring flooding and less storable water than in regions

    Like (B) and (C), this answer has some elements of More Cause / More Effect data points. But this answer deals with outliers (regions with the mildest winters) rather than a change (regions that went from colder to milder winters). And this answer doesn't include any of the causal connection between melting snowpacks and more flooding / less storable water.

  5. Weakens4% picked this

    The larger a mountain snowpack is, the greater the amount of spring flooding it is likely to

    The author's story actually involves a smaller snowpack (since a shrinking % of precipitation ends up being snow) leading to greater spring flooding. So this answer would Weaken the argument.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free