Although large cities are generally more polluted than the countryside, increasing urbanization may actually reduce the total amount of pollution generated nationwide. Residents of large cities usually rely more on mass transportation and live in smaller, more energy-efficient dwellings than do people in rural areas. Thus, a given number a large city than if dispersed among many small towns.
What this question is testing
Argument
The author opens with the claim that urbanization might cut nationwide pollution. Then everything that follows is evidence — city people use mass transit, live in smaller dwellings — and the final "Thus..." restates that opening claim in different words. So that opening line is the conclusion.
Method
It's a classic LSAT trick: putting the conclusion early in the stimulus and burying the supporting evidence after it. Indicator words like "Thus" at the end signal that the closing line is the conclusion or a restatement of it.
Goal
An answer that identifies the urbanization-reduces-pollution claim as the main conclusion.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.