Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT14 S4 Q7 Explanation

The number of hospital emergency room

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The number of hospital emergency room visits by heroin users grew by more than 25 percent during the 1980s. Clearly, then, rose in that decade.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Conclusion

The author concludes that heroin use went up in the 1980s.

Evidence

One fact: heroin-related ER visits grew by more than 25%.

Evaluate

Notice the leap. The author measures one thing (ER visits) and concludes about a different thing (overall heroin usage). That only works if ER visits move in lockstep with total heroin use.

If you're not sure that's the gap, think about what could have caused ER visits to grow without usage growing. Maybe the same number of users went to the ER more often. Maybe hospitals got better at logging heroin-related visits. Maybe a particularly bad batch of heroin caused more overdoses without more users.

To plug the gap on a Sufficient Assumption question, you need an answer strong enough to guarantee that more ER visits = more usage. The cleanest way is to assert that ER visits are proportional to usage levels.

Goal

Pick the answer that says ER visits and heroin usage move in proportion.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

The author’s conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Bad Evidence Match1% picked this

    Those who seek medical care because of heroin use usually do so in the later

    This says ER-seeking heroin users are typically late-stage addicts. That doesn't bridge ER visits to overall usage levels — it just describes when users seek care. The argument needs more visits to imply more users (or more use), and this answer doesn't establish that link. Plus it's consistent with a static user population that's just aging into late-stage addiction.

  2. Bad Evidence Match4% picked this

    Many heroin users visit hospital emergency

    If many users visit the ER repeatedly, that's evidence the visit count overstates the user count. The same fixed population of users could generate any number of visits. This answer actually weakens the argument's leap from visits to usage rather than bridging it.

  3. Correct89% picked this

    The number of visits to hospital emergency rooms by heroin users is proportional to the

    Why this is right

    This is the bridge. If the number of ER visits by heroin users is proportional to the incidence of heroin use, then a 25% rise in ER visits guarantees a corresponding rise in heroin use. The argument's leap from visit growth to usage growth is fully licensed by this assumption. That's exactly what a Sufficient Assumption needs to do.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Bad Evidence Match0% picked this

    The methods of using heroin have changed since 1980, and the new methods

    Less hazardous methods would generally decrease ER visits per user, which means a constant user population could see fewer visits. To explain a 25% rise in visits despite less hazardous methods, you'd need usage to rise even more — but this answer doesn't establish that. It complicates the visit-to-usage link rather than bridging it.

  5. Bad Evidence Match6% picked this

    Users of heroin identify themselves as such when they come to

    Whether users self-identify at the ER tells us how the ER counts heroin-using patients — a measurement issue. It doesn't bridge the count to overall usage. Even with perfect self-identification, the visit count could still vary independently of total usage (e.g., the same users come more often, or fewer users with more medical complications come more often).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free