Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT14 S4 Q6 Explanation

The number of hospital emergency room

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The number of hospital emergency room visits by heroin users grew by more than 25 percent during the 1980s. Clearly, then, rose in that decade.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Conclusion

The author looks at a 25% rise in ER visits by heroin users and concludes heroin use went up.

Evidence

That single ER-visit statistic.

Evaluate

Here's the gap. ER visits by heroin users could go up for two different reasons: more heroin users overall, OR the same number of users running into more medical trouble per person. The author assumed the first explanation. The question asks for an alternative that explains the rise without needing more heroin users.

Think of it like restaurant ER visits. If "diners go to the ER" doubles, it could mean more people are eating out — or it could mean food poisoning got worse. Same data, two very different stories.

Goal

Find an answer that gives a reason ER visits per heroin user went up — i.e., why the same heroin users would end up in the ER more often.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following, if true, would account for the statistic above without supporting

Answer choices

  1. Correct73% picked this

    Widespread use of automatic weapons in the drug trade during the 1980s raised the incidence of physical

    Why this is right

    This explains the ER-visit increase without supporting the conclusion. If automatic weapons in the drug trade became widespread in the 1980s, heroin users would be physically injured more often — gunshot wounds, drug-trade violence — leading to more ER trips. That accounts for the 25% rise in ER visits without needing the heroin-using population (or heroin use itself) to have grown. The same number of users could have ended up in the ER more frequently because of injuries from a more dangerous drug-trade environment.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. No Impact4% picked this

    The introduction of a smokable type of heroin during the 1980s removed the need for heroin to be injected intravenously and thus

    A smokable type of heroin reducing infection risk would, if anything, predict fewer ER visits per user (less infection-driven trips), not more. So this doesn't account for the 25% increase in ER visits at all. It also doesn't support an alternative explanation for the rise — it just describes a development that goes the wrong way.

  3. Restates Paradox3% picked this

    Many hospital emergency rooms were barely able to accommodate the dramatic increase in the number of medical emergencies related to

    This says ERs were strained by drug-related emergencies — basically restating that visits went up. It doesn't explain why the increase happened or offer an alternative to "more heroin use." The increase itself is the thing we're trying to account for, not a fact that helps account for it.

  4. Premise Support2% picked this

    Heroin use increased much more than is reflected in the rate of heroin-linked hospital

    This says heroin use rose even more than ER visits suggest. That actively supports the author's conclusion that heroin use rose — the opposite of what we want. We need an answer that accounts for the ER-visit rise without supporting the conclusion. This does the opposite.

  5. No Impact19% picked this

    Viral and bacterial infections, malnourishment, and overdoses account for most hospital emergency room visits

    This tells us what kinds of conditions account for most heroin-related ER visits (infections, malnourishment, overdoses). That's background about which medical issues drive the visits, but it doesn't say whether those conditions became more frequent in the 1980s. Without that, it can't explain the rise — and it doesn't offer an alternative to "more heroin use."

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free