Reading Comprehension

PT14 · S3 · P1 · Q4 Earth's Magnetic Field

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

It is a fundamental tenet of geophysics that the Earth’s magnetic field can exist in either of two polarity states: a “normal” state, in which north-seeking compass needles point to the geographic north, and a “reverse” state, in which they point to the geographic south.

Topic

The Earth's magnetic field reversals and possible explanations for why they occur.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

Scientists know the Earth's magnetic field sometimes reverses, but while several explanations have been proposed, the best explanations stick to internal Earth processes (like heat transfer in the core) rather than relying on outside events like asteroid impacts. (The last two sentences of the passage, especially: )

P1: Overview of Magnetic Field Reversal

The passage starts by explaining that Earth’s magnetic field flips between two states over time, with geological evidence showing that these reversals happen and are becoming more frequent. However, transitions between states aren't instant—they span several thousand years.

P2: What We Know and Don’t Know About Causes

We know the magnetic field is generated by motion in the Earth’s outer core, but we don’t fully understand how or why reversals happen. It might have to do with disturbances in the core’s heat circulation.

P3: Proposed Explanations (Heat-Transfer vs. Asteroid-Impact)

Two main hypotheses have been suggested: - The "heat-transfer" hypothesis says changes in how the core loses heat could mess up the core’s circulation and trigger a reversal. - The "asteroid-impact" hypothesis claims that big asteroid impacts, by changing climate and ice caps, could indirectly trigger reversals by changing how the Earth spins and stresses its core.

4.

Which one of the following statements regarding the polarity of the Earth’s magnetic field is best supported by information in the passage?

  1. Most, but not all, geophysicists

    Unsupported: not all

    It's hard to support this specific quantifier of "most, but not all". It means that it's "more than 50% but less than 100%". All we have to go off of is that it is a fundamental tenet of geophysics that magnetic field can exist in one of two states. If it's a fundamental tenet of the field of geophysics, it seems plausible that all modern geophysicists accept this idea, so we don't seem to have any support for the "but not all" part of this answer. In the real world, it's hard to imagine a 100% consensus on any scientific issue, but we have no visible textual support to justify saying "some geophysicists don't believe that polarity comes in two flavors".

    8% picked this

  2. Correct

    Changes in the polarity of

    Why this is right

    This is a frustratingly worded answer, because who knows what we mean by "recent past vs. distant past"? Is there some quantitative precision to that idea? I guess lacking any other way to quantify recent past from distant past, we can just think "the more recent 2.25 billion years of Earth's history" vs. "the initial 2.25 billion years of Earth's history". In other words, divide Earth's history in half, and call the first half the distant past and the second half the recent past. Given that we were told in the middle of the 1st paragraph that these reversals have been taking place at an increasing rate, we could definitely say that there have been more reversals in the last 2 billion years than there were in the first 2 billion years. If I was making baskets at an increasing rate throughout a basketball game, then I would have made more baskets in the 2nd half than in the 1st half.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    66% picked this

  3. Heat transfer would cause reversals

    Unknown Comparison

    Here, we're getting into the great unknowns of the speculative ideas within these two theories we hear about. The author never establishes a comparison that "hot and cold blobs perturbing the heat-circulation pattern" would happen more frequently than would "asteroid impacts causing redistribution of seawater". She only says that she finds an Earth-based explanation more convincing than an extraterrestrial explanation, but doesn't say it has anything to do with how frequently the causal mechanism of each theory would give rise to polarity reversals.

    6% picked this

  4. Geophysicists’ understanding of the reversal

    Too Strong: increased significantly

    Since both of these theories are highly speculative and far from settled, we have no grounds for saying that geophysicists understanding has greatly improved since someone introduced the potential storyline of "maybe blobs cause the polarity shifts?"

    3% picked this

  5. Friction near the boundary of

    Wrong Friction Zone

    The end of the 2nd paragraph implies that "friction and turbulence near the boundary of the outer core and the mantle" could initiate a polarity shift. This answer is claiming that friction between the boundary of the inner core and outer core could do it.

    17% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free