Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT14 S3 P1 Q2 Explanation

Earth's Magnetic Field

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsApplicationScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

It is a fundamental tenet of geophysics that the Earth’s magnetic field can exist in either of two polarity states: a “normal” state, in which north-seeking compass needles point to the geographic north, and a “reverse” state, in which they point to the geographic south. Geological evidence shows that periodically the field’s another; rather, the process involves a transition period that typically spans a few thousand years.

Though this much is known, the underlying causes of the reversal phenomenon are not well understood. It is generally accepted that the magnetic field itself is generated by the motion of free electrons in the outer core, a slowly churning mass of molten metal sandwiched between the Earth’s mantle (the region of disturbs the heat circulation pattern of the outer core fluid, and with it the magnetic field.

Several explanations for this phenomenon have been proposed. One proposal, the “heat-transfer hypothesis,” is that the triggering process is intimately related to the way the outer core vents its heat into the mantle. For example, such heat transfer could create hotter (rising) or cooler (descending) blobs of material from the inner and friction and turbulence near the outer core-mantle boundary and initiating a reversal of the magnetic field.

How well do these hypotheses account for such observations as the long-term increase in the frequency of reversal? In support of the asteroid-impact model, it has been argued that the gradual cooling of the average ocean temperature would enable progressively smaller asteroid impacts (which are known to occur more frequently than larger by means of the thermodynamic state of the outer core and its effect on the mantle.

What this question is testing

Application

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

The author’s objection to the second hypothesis discussed in the passage is most applicable to which one of the following explanations concerning the

Answer choices

  1. Not Extraterrestrial14% picked this

    The extinction of the dinosaurs was the result of gradual changes in the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere that

    Since this is talking about something subtle and gradual that takes place within the Earth's boundaries, it's not extraterrestrial.

  2. Not Extraterrestrial1% picked this

    The dinosaurs became extinct when their food supply was disrupted following the

    Since this is talking about extinction being caused by mammals, which is a cause that originated on Earth, it's not extraterrestrial.

  3. Not Extraterrestrial15% picked this

    The dinosaurs succumbed to the new, colder environment brought about by a buildup of volcanic

    Since this is talking about volcanos being the cause, it's not extraterrestrial.

  4. Not Extraterrestrial2% picked this

    After massively overpopulating the planet, dinosaurs disappeared due to widespread starvation and the rapid

    Since this is talking about overpopulation being the cause, it's not extraterrestrial.

  5. Correct68% picked this

    After radical climatic changes resulted from the impact of a comet, dinosaurs disappeared

    Why this is right

    Since this is talking about the impact of a comet being the cause, it's extraterrestrial, so it's vulnerable to a similar objection as the one the author made against the asteroid-impact model.

    Skill tested: Application · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free