Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT14 S2 Q15 Explanation

Zachary: One would have to be blind

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Zachary: One would have to be blind to the reality of moral obligation to deny that people who believe a course of action to be morally obligatory for them have both the right and the duty to pursue that any right to stop them from doing so.

Cynthia: But imagine an artist who feels morally obliged to do whatever she can to prevent works of art from being destroyed confronting a morally committed antipornography demonstrator engaged in destroying artworks he deems pornographic. According to your principle that artist has, simultaneously, both destruction and no right whatsoever to stop it.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following, if substituted for the scenario invoked by Cynthia, would preserve the force

Answer choices

  1. Only One is Morally Obliged1% picked this

    a medical researcher who feels a moral obligation not to claim sole credit for work that was performed in part by someone else confronting

    Person A feels a moral obligation to do X (not claim sole credit for work). Person B doesn't feel a moral obligation. We're looking for a situation where A feels morally obliged to do X, and B feels morally obliged to do not-X.

  2. Moral Obligations Don't Conflict8% picked this

    a manufacturer who feels a moral obligation to recall potentially dangerous products confronting a consumer advocate who feels morally

    We're looking for a situation where A feels morally obliged to do X, and B feels morally obliged to do not-X. Both people here feel moral obligations, but their impulses don't contradict. In the original example, the moral compulsion of the art-saver to prevent the destruction of artwork contradicted the moral compulsion of the art-destroyer to commit the destruction of artwork. Here, the two actions are "recall dangerous products" and "expose product defects". Those are actually pretty compatible cousins.

  3. Neither is Morally Obliged21% picked this

    an investment banker who believes that governments are morally obliged to regulate major industries confronting an investment banker who holds that governments have a

    This answer does present contradictory moral obligations, but they don't belong to the investment bankers. The investment bankers just have conflicting beliefs about what the government is morally obliged to do.

  4. Unclear Conflict6% picked this

    an architect who feels a moral obligation to design only energy-efficient buildings confronting, as a potential client, a corporation that believes its primary moral

    We're looking for a situation where A feels morally obliged to do X, and B feels morally obliged to do not-X. Here, we're dealing with a person and a corporation. Despite what the US Supreme Court says, corporations aren't people, so this is already a little dubious. These moral obligations also don't clearly contradict each other. Person A feels morally obliged to design only energy-efficient buildings. A contradictory person would feel morally obliged to make sure some non-energy efficient buildings are also designed. But "Person B" (the corporation) is saying that its primary moral obligation is to maximize shareholder profits. We would be bringing in a lot of outside assumptions if we think that "maximizing profits" contradicts "designing only energy-efficient buildings".

  5. Correct64% picked this

    a health inspector who feels morally obliged to enforce restrictions on the number of cats a householder may keep confronting a householder who, feeling

    Why this is right

    We're looking for a situation where A feels morally obliged to do X, and B feels morally obliged to do not-X. The inspector feels morally obliged to prevent homeowners from having more than the legal number of cats. The cat-lady, excuse me - I mean, the homeowner, feels morally obliged to take in more than the legal number of cats.

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free