Zachary: One would have to be blind

Answer choices

1. A

   Too Strong8% picked this

   the concept of moral obligation is

   This choice suggests that the entire concept of moral obligation is inherently flawed, which is not Cynthia's argument. She's critiquing Zachary's specific application of the concept, not the concept itself.

   8%
2. B

   Out of Scope1% picked this

   the ideas of right and duty should not be taken seriously since doing so leads

   Suggesting a comparison or value judgment not present in the argument, this choice misrepresents Cynthia’s discussion, which is not about weighing different interpretations of moral obligation but about the practical contradictions in Zachary’s principle.

   1%
3. C

   Correct70% picked this

   Zachary’s principle is untenable on its

   Why this is right

   This captures Cynthia's main point that Zachary's principle is untenable because it leads to logical contradictions, undermining its viability as a moral guideline.

   Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   70%
4. D

   Assumption-Bait14% picked this

   because the term “moral obligation” is understood differently by different people, it is impossible to find a principle concerning moral rights and

   The choice speculates on differing understandings of "moral obligation," which Cynthia does not address. Her point is about the outcomes of Zachary's principle, not how people interpret the term.

   14%
5. E

   Inference-Bait7% picked this

   Zachary’s principle is based on an understanding of moral obligation that is too narrow to encompass the kind of moral obligation artists

   This choice suggests a potential limitation or narrowness in understanding, distracting from Cynthia's central argument about contradictory obligations. Her focus is on practical conflicts, not theoretical inclusivity.

   7%