Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT139 S3 P2 Q11 Explanation

A Return to Tintypes

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

When Jayne Hinds Bidaut saw her first tintype, she was so struck by its rich creamy tones that she could hardly believe this photographic process had been abandoned. She set out to revive it. Bidaut had been searching for a way to photograph insects from her entomological collection, but paper prints simply dimensionality she wanted. The image-containing emulsion can often create a raised surface on the plate.

For the photographer Dan Estabrook, old albumen prints and tintypes inspired a fantasy. He imagines planting the ones he makes in flea markets and antique shops, to be bygone time that never existed.

On the verge of a filmless, digital revolution, photography is moving forward into its past. In addition to reviving the tintype process, photographers are polishing daguerreotype plates, coating paper with egg whites, making pinhole cameras, and mixing emulsions from nineteenth-century recipes in order to coax new expressive effects from old photography’s roots that the movement is more like a groundswell.

The old techniques are heavily hands-on and idiosyncratic. That is the source of their appeal. It is also the prime reason for their eclipse. Most became obsolete in a few decades, replaced by others that were simpler, cheaper, faster, and more consistent in their results. Only the tintype lasted as a curiosity cropped out by a nineteenth- century photographer, Estabrook retains them to heighten the sense of nostalgia.

This preoccupation with contingency offers a clue to the deeper motivations of many of the antiquarian avant-gardists. The widely variable outcome of old techniques virtually guarantees that each production is one of a kind and bears, on some level, the indelible mark of the artist’s encounter with a particular set of circumstances. an intimacy with photographic communication that mass media have all but overwhelmed.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the primary purpose of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: make a case for28% picked this

    to make a case for the aesthetic value of certain old

    I would probably save this on a first pass, because you can "make a case" for something at arm's length, and this passage was pretty much our author laying out the case for why people have been getting into these techniques. But lay out the case for X conveys more clearly, "These aren't my beliefs; but this is what someone who does believe would say". To say that some wrote an essay "to make a case for X" sounds too much like the writer is trying to champion / recommend / endorse X, and this author was not that explicitly into it.

  2. Wrong Emphasis: provide details18% picked this

    to provide details of how certain old methods of photographic processing are used in

    The author did provide some details, but this is too narrow. The focus of the passage is definitely to talk about this recent trend and why the artists are doing it. The main focus was not an instruction manual on the details of using these techniques.

  3. Correct50% picked this

    to give an account of a surprising recent development in the

    Why this is right

    Yes, this somewhat dovetails the Highlight Noteworthy purpose with the Explain Something Puzzling. A surprising recent development ("groundswell") in the photographic arts is the noteworthy thing the author is trying to highlight. And accounting for why it's happening, i.e. explaining the motivations of the artists involved, is explaining to the reader not just what is happening, but why it's happening.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope: acclaim2% picked this

    to explain the acclaim that photographers using old photographic techniques

    Nothing in this passage ever cites that these artists have garnered any acclaim for the works created using these old processes.

  5. Wrong Emphasis1% picked this

    to contrast the approaches used by two

    Wrong Emphasis: two photographers Opposite: to contrast The central topic is broader than Estabrook and Bidaut, so that quickly shows us that this answer is too narrow. But even within the context of the actual essay, the author was stressing the similarities between Bidaut's and Estabrook's photography. They are both part of this groundswell of interest in old-timey techniques, which is the central topic of the passage.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free