Reading Comprehension

PT139 · S3 · P1 · Q4 Improving Farm Economics

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The prevailing trend in agriculture toward massive and highly mechanized production, with its heavy dependence on debt and credit as a means of raising capital, has been linked to the growing problem of bankruptcy among small farms.

Topic

A new approach for small farms to survive and thrive—Booker T. Whatley’s strategy for making small-scale farming profitable despite tough economic odds.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

Booker T. Whatley offers a comprehensive, innovative approach that enables small farms to remain profitable and competitive by focusing on diverse crops, creating direct relationships with customers, and minimizing operational costs. (The “Most Valuable Sentence” appears at the end of the last paragraph: )

P1: The Problem and Introduction of Whatley’s Counter-Approach

Small farms are being squeezed out by big, industrial agriculture, mainly because they can’t keep up with the financial demands. Booker T. Whatley presents an alternative system to help small farmers survive and succeed, despite these challenges.

P2: Whatley’s Guidelines for Year-Round Profitability

Whatley suggests that small farms should grow lots of different crops to avoid disaster if one fails, and minimize risky borrowing. He introduces the idea of a “clientele membership club” (CMC), where customers pay ahead of time and pick their own produce, ensuring a stable market and consistent income for the farm.

P3: Cost-Saving Benefits and Direct Sales Model

A big bonus of Whatley’s pick-your-own system is that it slashes half the usual harvesting costs, letting farmers charge less than supermarkets but still turn a profit. It also cuts out distributors by selling directly to consumers. Whatley recommends building a large club of city-dwellers who want fresh produce.

4.

The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

  1. Correct

    summarizing the main points of

    Why this is right

    This is close to what we anticipated: "present someone's potential Solution to a Problem". Of all the answers, it feels most aligned with the Problem / Solution framework. Is it fair to call Whatley's solution "innovative"? Yes, because "Whatley proposed an approach that runs counter to this trend". When you're going against the trend, you're usually plotting a new, different course, so it's fair to call it innovative. Is the problem "serious"? Sure, it's a growing number of bankruptcies. Bankruptcies are very serious for businesses or people that go through them.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    90% picked this

  2. examining contemporary trends and isolating

    Out of Scope: examining trends

    "Examining contemporary trends" doesn't make any sense as a fit for this passage. 95% of the passage is describing Whatley's proposed apporach, which goes against contemporary trends. And this answer is saying that multiple trends are being examined. Meanwhile, the passage is totally focused on Whatlely's proposed approach.

    0% picked this

  3. criticizing widely accepted practices within

    Out of Scope: criticizing

    The author's voice/opinion never shows up in this passage. She identifies the context of why we're hearing about Whatley (the growing number of small farms going bankrupt) and then presents Whatley's solution. She never criticizes anything or anyone.

    0% picked this

  4. demonstrating the advantages and disadvantages

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: demonstrating Out of Scope: disadvantages The reader might take in the author's presentation of Whatley's new strategy within the farming industry and decide for themselves what seem like advantages or disadvantages, but the author never editorializes. To "demonstrate" the advantages and disadvantages would mean that the author is actively arguing or showing evidence in order to show us what's good and what's bad about Whatley's plan. But the passage merely presents a new strategy within an industry. This answer sounds more like a passage we would write a couple years from now, reflecting on success stories and pitfalls of people who followed Whatley's strategy.

    2% picked this

  5. analyzing the impact of a

    Out of Scope: analyzing impact

    The author just presents Whatley's new idea. She never analyzes what impact it's having (we don't know if anyone is even following Whatley's plan yet). We also were never told that farming was a tradition-driven industry. We would just be plucking that from our brains.

    7% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free