Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT139 S1 Q12 Explanation

One should apologize only

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

One should apologize only to a person one has wronged, and only for having wronged that person.To apologize sincerely is to acknowledge that one has acted wrongfully. One cannot apologize sincerely unless one intends not to repeat that wrongful act. To accept an apology sincerely vow not to hold a grudge against the wrongdoer.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of

Answer choices

  1. Bad Trigger Match: intent vs. result23% picked this

    If one apologizes and subsequently repeats the wrongful act for which one has apologized, then one

    Do we have a rule that lets us derive that you haven't apologized sincerely? Yes, if you either 1. never acknowledged that you acted wrongfully or 2. you don't intend to avoid that wrongful act in the future This answer choice seems to establish #2, but it's only establishing that you did repeat the wrongful act. It doesn't address your intentions.

  2. Unsupported Relationship2% picked this

    One cannot sincerely accept an apology that was not

    Do we have a way to derive that you cannot sincerely accept an apology? Yes, we could either establish that 1. you didn't acknowledge that a wrong had occurred or 2. you didn't vow to avoid holding a grudge against the wrongdoer Neither of those things overlap with the criteria for giving a sincere apology, so there's no way to say that a failure to give a sincere apology prevents the ability to sincerely accept that apology.

  3. Reversed Logic2% picked this

    If one commits a wrongful act, then one should sincerely apologize

    We don't have any means to prove that you should sincerely apologize. The first sentence only gives us criteria that would allow you to derive that you shouldn't: - you didn't wrong that person - you're apologizing for something other than wronging that person We know: should apologize → committed wrongful act and this says committed wrongful act → should apologize

  4. Unsupported Relationship2% picked this

    An apology that cannot be sincerely accepted cannot be

    This says apology apology can't be sincerely → can't be sincerely accepted offered As we examined with (B), the criteria for sincerely offering an apology are non-overlapping with the criteria for sincerely accepting an apology, so there's no way to make one of them trigger the other.

  5. Correct71% picked this

    An apology cannot be both sincerely offered and sincerely accepted unless each person acknowledges that a

    Why this is right

    This is saying that both sincere offers of apologies and sincere acceptance of apologies require that a wrongful act has occurred. We knew that offering a sincere apology required two things: 1. acknowledge you acted wrongfully 2. intend to avoid that act in the future We knew that sincerely accepting an apology required two things: 1. acknowledge a wrong 2. vow not to hold a grudge It looks like we can derive this answer choice, since both of those required "acknowledging that a wrongful act has occurred".

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free