Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT138 S3 Q23 Explanation

Art historian: This painting, purportedly

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Art historian: This painting, purportedly by Mary Cassatt, is a forgery. Although the canvas and other materials are consistent with most of Cassatt's work, and the subject matter is similar to that of Cassatt's finest paintings, the brush style of this painting is not Hence this painting is definitely not a genuine Cassatt.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

The art historian's argument depends on assuming which one of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: readily available3% picked this

    The type of canvas and other materials that Cassatt used in most of her work were

    Our assumption will definitely be about brush style, not about any of the other aspects (canvas / materials / subject matter). The author is only assuming that if the brush style doesn't match any known Cassatt, then it's not a Cassatt.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    None of Cassatt's works is painted using a brush style that is not exhibited in any

    Why this is right

    We can recognize that this is a conditional answer and try to diagram it, so that we can ask ourselves, "Did the author make this (or the contrapositive of this) reasoning move?" This is a tricky statement since it involves a double negative: None of her works used a style not-exhibited in any of her known works. If we said, "None of my friends are not-happy to to get free food", it would mean the same as "All of my friends are happy to get free food". So this sentence is saying, "All of her works use a brush style that is exhibited in some of her known works." The contrapositive is much more appealing match for the argument's reasoning move: "If a work is painted in a brush style that is not-exhibited in any of Cassatt's known works, then it is not a work of Cassatt". We could also reference our knowledge that "No A's are B" is the same as "All A's are ~B". Thus, this is saying all of her works do not use a brush style that is not exhibited in any of her known works. Again we have a double negative at the end there, so it turns into a positive: "all of her works use a brush style that is exhibited in at least one of her known works". Our other technique on Necessary Assumption is the negation test. If we negate an answer and it becomes an objection, then we have a winning answer. The negation of None is Some (at least one). So the negation of this answer is saying, "At least one of Cassatt's works is painted using a brush style that is not exhibited in any of her known works". That would badly weaken the argument. The author thinks that the fact that this painting has a brush style that doesn't match any of her known works rules out the possibility of this painting being by Cassatt. Negating this answer says that there's at least one Cassatt painting that has such a trait (its brush style doesn't match any other Cassatt painting).

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong: generally2% picked this

    Cassatt's work generally had a characteristic subject matter that distinguished it from the work of other

    Our assumption will definitely be about brush style, not about any of the other aspects (canvas / materials / subject matter). The author is only assuming that if the brush style doesn't match any known Cassatt, then it's not a Cassatt.

  4. Too Strong: most characteristic9% picked this

    The most characteristic feature of Cassatt's work is her

    The author doesn't need her brush style to be the most characteristic feature. Even if brush style is her 2nd most characteristic feature, this argument still makes just as much sense.

  5. Too Strong: no one can match6% picked this

    No painter other than Cassatt would be able to match Cassatt's

    The author doesn't need to assume that Cassatt is the only painter in the universe who is capable of pulling off her brush style perfectly. If we negated this and said, "Actually, author -- there's at least one other painter who can copy Cassatt's brush style perfectly", that wouldn't hurt this argument at all. This argument is about a painting that doesn't have Cassatt's brush style, so the existence of a brush style copycat has nothing to do with this painting.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free