Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT138 S3 Q17 Explanation

The conventional view is that asteroids

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The conventional view is that asteroids strike the earth at random locations, thereby randomly affecting various aspects of the earth's evolution. One iconoclastic geophysicist claims instead that asteroids have struck the earth through a highly organized natural process. Cited as evidence is the unusual pattern of impact craters that form a halo-like Cretaceous period, followed by a mass extinction of much land and ocean life.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Which one of the following, if true, would most help to support the

Answer choices

  1. Unrelated to Goal11% picked this

    Several asteroid strikes within a short period could produce both volcanic activity that warms the oceans and atmospheric debris that blocks sunlight, and

    This answer seems to be trying to help us strengthen the idea that the asteroid strikes near the end of the Cretaceous period caused the mass extinction that followed. But the question stem asked us to support the geophysicist's claim. That last sentence is apparently believed by a lot of people, because the final sentence begins "There is a consensus that ... ". This answer only talks about the effects of asteroid strikes, but we're concerned about the causes of asteroid strikes: random or highly organized natural process?

  2. No Impact (pun intended)4% picked this

    If asteroids repeatedly pummel the same spots, the beating may affect the flow of molten rock inside the earth, which would affect the degree

    This is also talking about the effects of asteroid strikes, but it's not helping ascertain the cause of the halo-swath of craters or ascertain whether asteroids strike randomly or through some highly organized process.

  3. Weakens13% picked this

    The impact craters that form a halo-like swath across the Northern Hemisphere were the result of a single cluster

    This provides an Alternate Explanation for the halo-like swath. The halo doesn't exist because some highly organized process leads the asteroids to strike in that way. The halo just exists because they're all from the same cluster of meteors. The author is thinking that some natural process is guiding asteroids, over the ages, to this same halo area of the northern hemisphere. This answer is saying, no, these craters were just formed by one random toss of a meteor cluster.

  4. Correct68% picked this

    Lumpy masses within the earth cause gravitational interactions with approaching asteroids that force them into

    Why this is right

    This adds some plausibility to the geophysicist's claim, that asteroids hit the earth through a highly organized natural process. It provides the causal mechanism by which something like that could take place: If approaching asteroids are forced by gravity into specific orbits before impact, that sounds a lot like there's a highly organized natural process.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Weakens5% picked this

    No similar pattern of impact craters was created during any other period of

    It hurts the plausibility of the geophysicist's claim that this is a highly organized natural process if it's not recurring.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free