Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT138 S1 P2 Q11 Explanation

Plant Evolution

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The characteristic smell or taste of a plant, to insects as well as to humans, depends on its chemical composition. Broadly speaking, plants contain two categories of chemical substances: primary and secondary. The primary substances, such as proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins, and hormones, are required for growth and proper functioning and are found a single family. It is these secondary substances that give plants their distinctive tastes and smells.

Insects appear to have played a major role in many plants’ having the secondary substances they have today. Such substances undoubtedly first appeared, and new ones continue to appear, as the result of genetic mutations in individual plants. But if a mutation is to survive and be passed on to subsequent generations, insect from feeding by warning it of the presence of some other substance that is harmful.

For hundreds of millions of years there has been an evolutionary competition for advantage between plants and plant-eating insects. If insects are to survive as the plants they eat develop defenses against them, they must switch to other foods or evolve ways to circumvent the plants’ defenses. They may evolve a way have thus tended to become associated with narrowly defined and often botanically restricted groups of plants.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

The passage provides the most support for inferring which one of

Answer choices

  1. Correct75% picked this

    Some chemicals that are not known to be directly involved in the growth or metabolism of any species of plant play vital roles in

    Why this is right

    This is lovably soft, because it's saying "some", so this is worth investigating. Did we talk about chemicals "not known to be directly involved in the growth or metabolism of any species of plant"? "Growth and metabolism" is discussed in the middle of paragraph 1, where it says: the secondary substances are a diverse and multitudinous array of chemicals that have no known role in the internal chemical processes of plants' growth or metabolism. Okay, so "secondary substances" apply to this description. Thus, this answer is saying "some secondary substances play a vital role in the lives of various kinds of plants". Can we support that some secondary substances play a vital role? We know secondary substances give plants their distinctive tastes and smells, but does that qualify as "playing a vital role"? The 2nd paragraph is saying that secondary substances would not have been passed to so many subsequent generations if they weren't "increasing the likelihood of the organism's surviving and reproducing". That line seems like enough support for the idea that some secondary substances play a vital role. We also hear stuff about secondary substances like - attracts pollinators (that's vital) - biochemical defense against enemies (that's vital)

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong: most13% picked this

    Most plants that have evolved chemical defense systems against certain insect species are nevertheless used as food by a wide variety of insects that

    The only "most" fact about plants we get in the passage is the 2nd sentence: most plants contain two categories of chemical substances: primary and secondary This answer is about "most plants w/ chemical defense systems". We definitely don't have any generalization about that subgroup that would allow us to say what is true of most of them. In the final paragraph we hear that when a plant develops a chemical defense system, "the insects [that eat that plant] must switch to other foods or evolve ways to circumvent the plants' defenses." This answer choice is saying more than 50% take the 2nd option, but we can quantify that. Maybe most of the time insects just switch to other foods.

  3. Too Strong: most4% picked this

    Most insects that feed exclusively on certain botanically restricted groups of plants are able to identify these plants by means other than

    Here we have another Unknown Most Group. The passage never said what was true of "most insects that feed exclusively on a botanically restricted group of plants". The final sentence of the passage is saying, "Most insect species (tended to) become associated with botanically restricted groups of plants". But we have no evidence that most insects who are constrained to a certain group of plants can identify them by means other than taste / smell.

  4. Out of Scope: evolved independently3% picked this

    Many secondary substances that are toxic to insects are thought by scientists to have evolved independently in various unrelated species of plants but to

    The passage is suggesting the opposite of this. It's saying (P2) that "Insects appear to have played a major role in many plants' having the secondary substances (like toxic chemicals) they have today." The passage is saying that secondary substances first appear as random mutations, but the survival advantage conferred by some of these mutations (because of the insects that otherwise eat these plants) made these traits naturally selected for, i.e. this mutation got passed onto subsequent generations because it helped the plant survive. Nothing in the passage is saying that many of these secondary substances evolved independently in various species. The final paragraph is stressing how "for hundreds of millions of years there has been an evolutionary competition for advantage between plants and plant-eating insects". The emergence of secondary substances that eventually become a trait of the plant species is dynamically related to the insects that are preying on that plant.

  5. Out of Scope: non-secondary toxins4% picked this

    Some toxic substances that are produced by plants evolved in correlation with secondary substances but are

    This answer is lovably soft, because of "some", but we can't find anything in the passage that talks about some toxins that are not themselves secondary substances. The only toxic substances ever talked about were all secondary substances.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free