Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT137 S4 Q10 Explanation

Economist: In free market systems

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Economist: In free market systems, the primary responsibility of corporate executives is to determine a nation's industrial technology, the pattern of work organization, location of industry, and resource allocation. They also are the decision makers, though subject to significant consumer control, on what is to be produced and in what quantities. In over to business executives. Thus, business executives have become public officials.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens7% picked this

    Most of the decisions made by business executives in free market systems are made by the government in

    This choice equates the decisions made by executives in a free market with those made by government officials in centrally planned economies, reinforcing the analogy that executives act like public officials.

  2. Correct85% picked this

    Making decisions about patterns of work organization, resource allocation, and location of industry is not the core of

    Why this is right

    This weakens the argument by differentiating executive responsibilities from the essence of what public officials do, thereby severing the supposed link between executive roles and public duties.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Strengthens (if anything)0% picked this

    The salaries of business executives are commensurate with the salaries of high­

    This choice notes that executive salaries are proportionate with high-ranking officials, making them seem more similar, which strengthens the conclusion that executives are like public officials.

  4. No Impact5% picked this

    What a country produces and in what quantities is not always completely controlled

    This asserts that corporate executives do not have complete control over what a country produces, which is a super weak (thus, super unlikely to be correct) idea and echoes what we already heard, which is that consumers have significant control over what and how much to make.

  5. Strengthens (if anything)3% picked this

    Public officials and business executives often cooperate in making decisions of

    This indicates that public officials and business executives often cooperate in decision-making, further supporting the analogy that executives act like public officials by showing them working together on key issues.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free