Reading Comprehension

PT137 · S1 · P1 · Q4 Lorenzo Tucker

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Until my present study, African American entertainer Lorenzo Tucker had not been extensively discussed in histories of United States theater and film.

Topic

Lorenzo Tucker’s contributions to African American theater and film, and the process of creating his career biography.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy (With elements of Answer / Explain—explaining the approach and challenges of the biography)

Main Point

Lorenzo Tucker was an influential but understudied figure in American entertainment, and this study uses a careful blend of oral and documentary evidence to create his career biography, thereby addressing a gap in historical scholarship. The Most Valuable Sentence: (End of P4)

P1: Introducing Tucker and His Significance

We’re told that Lorenzo Tucker made major contributions to theater and film over sixty years, yet he hasn’t received much scholarly attention. The author collected memorabilia and personal memories from Tucker himself, aiming to shed new light on a neglected corner of U.S. entertainment history.

P2: Methods and Sources for the Study

The author explains the variety of sources used to research Tucker’s life, including library archives, interviews with fellow performers, viewing Tucker’s films, and especially personal interviews with Tucker.

P3: Pros and Cons of Biographing a Living Person

Here the author discusses the benefit of being able to interview the subject directly, but also the bias and unreliability that comes with personal memory, which means careful corroboration is necessary.

The passage most strongly supports the inference that the author would agree with which one of the following statements about the text that this passage introduces?

Its subject matter and methodology
Opposite
The author's first paragraph contains tidbits that suggest this would more likely be academic than popular. It's a "study", not a page-turning biography. It's about an obscure dude that was mainly behind the scenes. It's not going to be a popular topic at Barnes & Noble. And the first paragraph stresses in the final sentence of the first paragraph that she hopes this study will help to ameliorate the "insufficient scholarship" on this topic thus far.
1% picked this
It should be valuable to
Out of Scope: innovative methods
We were never told that any of the author's methods were particularly inventive. She interviewed the dude. She watched his movies, checked out his photos, read his news clippings, etc. The passage never says that author developed a brand new method.
14% picked this
Correct
It should be interesting not
Why this is right
This is supportable from the first paragraph. The very first sentence is saying: Until my study, Tucker had not been extensively discussed in histories of US theater and film. So that supports the notion that this author thinks her study will be interesting, since few have covered this noteworthy person. The last sentence of the first paragraph says: [Tucker's] artifacts and memories help shed new light on a part of US entertainment history about which there has been insufficient scholarship. This is good support for the notion that this author thinks there is interesting information regarding US entertainment history.
Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
73% picked this
It should not be taken
Opposite
It seems like the author is writing a serious historical study of Tucker. She would want it to be taken mainly as an attempt to objectively recount his career. In the 3rd paragraph, the author takes great pains to reassure us that she is soberly aware of the dangers of oral testimony, since she knows it's prone to personal bias. She says in the closing sentence of the 3rd: It is the duty of the biographer (i.e. her) to verify as much as possible.
10% picked this
It should be accepted as
Out of Scope
Out of Scope: a guide for verifying This answer choice makes it sound like, instead of being a biographical summary of Tucker's career, this study will be a handy dandy guide for figuring out whether a given piece of Hollywood memorabilia is authentic or not. Tucker has an impressive collection of memorabilia, but that doesn't mean a biography about him will be an instructional resource about how to gauge the authenticity of a supposed piece of Hollywood memorabilia.
2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free