Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT136 S4 Q23 Explanation

Alex: Shrimp farming results

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Alex: Shrimp farming results in damage to the environment, because investors make quick profits from such abandon the farms.

Jolene: I disagree. Although some shrimp farms have proved unsustainable and have been quickly abandoned, properly built shrimp farms take a long time to construct and are costly to operate. Most owners farms are productive for many years.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

Their dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Alex and Jolene disagree with each

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: eventually24% picked this

    most owners of shrimp farms eventually abandon

    We know that Alex thinks most farmers quickly abandon their farms, so he would agree with this. Jolene doesn't think they quickly abandon their farms, but we don't know how she feels about the long-term "eventually". She only says that farmers plan to operate for many years, but not necessarily indefinitely.

  2. Correct61% picked this

    shrimp farming often yields a quick,

    Why this is right

    Alex would agree with this since he thinks that investors in shrimp farming "make quick profits and then abandon the farms", whereas Jolene would disagree, saying that "it takes a long time to construct and is costly to operate".

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Unknown for Person 27% picked this

    shrimp farming hardly ever damages the

    We know that Alex would disagree with this, but we don't have any clear indication of what Jolene thinks regarding the potential environmental damage of shrimp farming.

  4. Unknown for Person 24% picked this

    abandonment of a shrimp farm results in damage to

    We know that Alex would agree with this, but we don't have any clear indication of what Jolene thinks regarding the potential environmental damage of shrimp farming.

  5. Unknown for Person 24% picked this

    some shrimp farmers are environmentally

    We know that Alex would probably agree with this (although this wording of "irresponsible" is drifting farther out of scope), but we don't have any clear indication of what Jolene thinks regarding the potential environmental damage of shrimp farming.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free