Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT136 S4 Q13 Explanation

Proponents of nuclear power

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Proponents of nuclear power point out that new nuclear plants are so technologically sophisticated that the chances of a meltdown are extremely small. This is true, but it would still be unwise to build of a meltdown are absolutely catastrophic.

What this question is testing

Parallel

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Premise2% picked this

    Many mountain climbers claim that their sport is safe because mishaps, though often fatal, are rare. However, mountain climbing is very risky: although the

    This argument asserts that the chances of a mishap are greater than it may seem. The original argument does not contest the likelihood of an accident but rather asserts that the consequences of a mishap outweigh the low chance of a mishap.

  2. Wrong Premise1% picked this

    Eating a serving of vegetables just once will not improve your health. It is nonetheless prudent to do so, for eating vegetables every day

    This argument asserts that it is not a single instance of eating vegetables that makes it worthwhile, but rather that the benefits are realized over the long run.

  3. Wrong Premise3% picked this

    Skydivers always use two parachutes: a main chute and an auxiliary one in case the main chute malfunctions. Thus, the risk of a fatal

    This argument rests on comparing the benefits with the costs and suggests that the benefits are not enough to warrant the risk. Minimizing the benefits is different than emphasizing the potential risk.

  4. Correct90% picked this

    The risk of serious injury when bungee jumping is quite low. Nonetheless, it is reckless to engage in that activity, for the injuries that

    Why this is right

    This argument parallels the reasoning in the stimulus by suggesting that the consequences of a bad outcome outweigh the fact that the chances of such an outcome are small.

    Skill tested: Parallel · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Wrong Premise5% picked this

    People complain about having to wear seat belts because they believe the chances of traffic accidents are slim. This is true; on any given

    This argument rests on a different premise than the argument in the stimulus. This minimizes the cost of compliance rather than emphasizing the potential risk.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free