Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT136 S3 P3 Q13 Explanation

Evolutionary Game Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Traditional theories of animal behavior assert that animal conflict within a species is highly ritualized and does not vary from contest to contest. This species-specific model assumes that repetitive use of the same visual and vocal displays and an absence of escalated fighting evolved to prevent injury. The contestant that exhibits the one another and stretching their necks skyward; the tortoise perceived as being "taller" wins.

In populations of the spider Agelenopsis aperta, however, fighting behavior varies greatly from contest to contest. In addition, fighting is not limited to displays: biting and shoving are common. Susan Riechert argues that a recently developed model, evolutionary game theory, provides a closer fit to A. aperta territorial disputes than does the what constitutes winning; in evolutionary game theory, the payoffs are defined in terms of reproductive success.

In studying populations of A. aperta in a grassland habitat and a riparian habitat, Riechert predicts that such factors as the size of the opponents, the potential rate of predation in a habitat, and the probability of winning a subsequent site if the dispute is lost will all affect the behavior of fighting than in the riparian habitat, where 90 percent of the habitat is suitable for occupation.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following best states the main idea of

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported12% picked this

    Evolutionary game theory and classical game theory can be used to analyze the process of decision-making used by humans

    Evolutionary game theory is used to explain behavior but does not go so far as to analyze the process of decision-making. While classical game theory assumes rational thought is used to determine which action to take, evolutionary game theory assumes instinct and long-term advantage ultimately determine the strategies that are exhibited (second paragraph).

  2. Too Narrow / Too Strong2% picked this

    A. aperta in grassland habitats and riparian habitats exhibit an unusually wide variety of fighting

    A. aperta is an example used to illustrate evolutionary game theory, but is not the main point. Furthermore, the fighting behavior of A. aperta varies greatly from contest to contest (second paragrah), but that does not amount to an unusually wide variety of fighting behaviors.

  3. Correct70% picked this

    Evolutionary game theory may be useful in explaining the behavior of certain spiders

    Why this is right

    This is supported in the second paragraph.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unsupported4% picked this

    The traditional theory of animal behavior in conflict situations cannot be used to explain the fighting

    The proportion of species for which the traditional theory of animal behavior explains their fighting behavior is not stated in the passage.

  5. Too Strong12% picked this

    Evolutionary game theory, adapted from classical game theory, is currently used by scientists to predict the behavior of

    Riechert argues that evolutionary game theory can help predict animal behavior, but the passage does not indicate that scientists currently use the model to make predictions. Furthermore, the model fits the behavior of A. aperta, but not necessarily other spiders.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free